Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 5:02 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Coordinate engineering projects

Coordinate engineering projects

Unit of competency
National Code
MEM22013A
State Code
WE912
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
20/12/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
16/04/2013
Field of Education
080315 - Project Management
Original Release Date
16/04/2013
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit of competency covers the coordination of engineering projects within project plans and budgets. It includes monitoring and maintaining the project implementation plan, performance analysis and use of project management software.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Review and confirm parameters of delegated project
  • 1.1 Review designs, drawings, standards and established implementation plan and schedule to establish scope of the engineering project
  • 1.2 Review budget and control measures for delegated project
  • 1.3 Review project management structure, functional team relationships, communications and reporting lines
  • 1.4 Review materials, logistics and services procurement requirements
  • 1.5 Review the need for appropriate technical and professional assistance
  • 1.6 Review physical resources requirements
  • 1.7 Review human resources and skills development requirements
  • 1.8 Review compliance requirements for project, including WHS requirements, codes of practice, regulations, standards, legal and other regulatory requirements, and enterprise procedures
2 Coordinate implementation of delegated project
  • 2.1 Assign and obtain team agreement to plans, communication arrangements, responsibilities, schedules and requirements
  • 2.2 Establish liaison arrangements with other functional groups
  • 2.3 Ensure efficient and documented arrangements for requests for further information (RFIs) from designers and other experts
  • 2.4 Confirm internal and external reporting requirements, including content, schedule and sign-off arrangements
  • 2.5 Confirm suppliers, contractors and delivery schedules, and any installation requirements
  • 2.6 Coordinate actions to overcome constraints and contingencies, including coordination with stakeholders and adjustments, if necessary, to plans and schedules
  • 2.7 Coordinate and monitor specialist and technical support services to meet schedules, budgets and performance requirements
  • 2.8 Maintain and monitor records of project tasks for accountability against objectives, schedule and budget
  • 2.9 Apply principles of continuous improvement to implementation
  • 2.10 Implement project management, resources control and budgeting software, when required
3 Report on outcomes
  • 3.1 Record progress in accordance with procedures
  • 3.2 Supervise the completion of project, including sign-off and completion of required documentation of the project
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Personal responsibilities
Personal responsibilities within the project may be defined by:
role specification and delegations
workplace agreement or Award
negotiation with clients and/or supervisors
contracts
legal or regulatory obligations
professional and ethical considerations
agreed operational or project requirements
Systems thinking
Systems thinking refers to the conduct of engineering work in a manner that demonstrates knowledge of how the interaction of different technical systems on equipment, machinery or structures, as well as the skills and techniques of personnel, combine to perform or support engineering-related operations, processes or projects. It embraces determining or establishing how the function of each technical system or component, as well as the skills and techniques of personnel, effects or potentially may effect, outcomes. Systems should be interpreted broadly within the context of the organisation and depending on the project or operation can include equipment, related facilities, material, software, internal services and personnel, and other organisations in the value chain
WHS, regulatory requirements and enterprise procedures

WHS, regulatory requirements and enterprise procedures may include:
WHS Acts and regulations
relevant standards
codes of practice from Australian and overseas engineering and technical associations and societies
environmental protection and planning law
risk assessments
registration requirements
safe work practices
state and territory regulatory requirements
Stakeholders
Relevant stakeholders may include:
teams
contractors
support professionals and teams
technicians
functional groups
customers
suppliers
Records of project
Records of project may include:
tenders and contracts
schedules
personnel
resource allocations and financial management procedures
standard operating procedures, including maintenance procedures
WHS committee minutes and action
risk management and mitigation
documentation and records of current safe work methods statements (SWMS), material safety data sheets (MSDS), work permits, standards and codes of practice
audits
meetings and communications
graphics and specifications
Continuous improvement implementation
Continuous improvement implementation may relate to:
plant, products, processes, systems or services, including design, development, implementation or manufacture, commissioning, operation or delivery and maintenance. It may include techniques, such as:
balanced scorecard
current and future state mapping
measuring performance against benchmarks
process improvement, problem solving and decision making
data management, generation, recording, analysing, storing and use of software
training for improvement systems participation
technical training
Appropriate technical and professional assistance
Appropriate technical and professional assistance may include:
technical support and advice relating to elements which have intrinsic dangers
professional and technical support for specific technologiesand equipment
professional services for:
finance, accounts and tax
insurance and legal,
training and human resources
Constraints and contingencies
Constraints and contingencies may be:
financial, organisational, procedural or culture constraints
physical constraints, such as limits to resources, limits to site access or logistical limitations
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to coordinate an engineering project This includes working individually and as part of a team and recognising and complying with normal control procedures on engineering projects.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Assessors must be satisfied that the candidate can competently and consistently:
review, confirm and establish project objectives, plans and schedules
identify technical and engineering requirements of project from drawings, customer briefs, contracts and other appropriate sources
identify and manage stakeholders, including customers, suppliers, contractors and regulatory agencies
manage for contingencies and non-conformances
cooperate, communicate and negotiate effectively with stakeholders.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
This unit may be assessed on the job, off the job or a combination of both on and off the job. Where assessment occurs off the job, then a simulated working environment must be used where the range of conditions reflects realistic workplace situations. The competencies covered by this unit would be demonstrated by an individual working alone or as part of a team.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Method of assessment
Assessment must satisfy the endorsed Assessment Guidelines of the MEM05 Metal and Engineering Training Package.
Assessment methods must confirm consistency and accuracy of performance (over time and in a range of workplace relevant contexts) together with application of underpinning knowledge.
Assessment methods must be by direct observation of tasks and include questioning on underpinning knowledge to ensure correct interpretation and application.
Assessment may be applied under project-related conditions (real or simulated) and require evidence of process.
Assessment must confirm a reasonable inference that competency is not only able to be satisfied under the particular circumstance, but is able to be transferred to other circumstances.
Assessment may be in conjunction with assessment of other units of competency where required.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
W5674 MEM22004A Manage engineering projects Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
OEU28 MEM22013 Coordinate engineering projects Unit of competency