Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 8:31 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Conduct fraud control awareness sessions

Conduct fraud control awareness sessions

Unit of competency
National Code
PSPFRAU407B
State Code
C8122
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
3.00
Current Release Date
01/11/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
13/12/2012
Field of Education
070199 - Teacher Education, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
13/12/2012
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit covers the presentation of information/awareness sessions focused on fraud and corruption control activities. It includes preparing for, and delivering fraud and corruption control awareness presentations and reviewing the outcomes.Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption. In practice, conducting fraud and corruption control awareness sessions may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, complying with legislation, delivering service to clients, promoting client compliance with legislation, etc.This unit replaces and is equivalent to PSPFRAU407A Deliver training in fraud control awareness.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Prepare for fraud and corruption control awareness presentation
  • 1.1 Objectives are developed for the presentation that reflect the identified needs of the participants, are achievable and stated in terms of outcomes.
  • 1.2 Presentation methods are selected to suit identified outcomes, participants' needs and availability of equipment and resources.
  • 1.3 Provision is made for participants to contribute to the session based on their experience.
  • 1.4 Content of materials to be used is validated by experience before use, where possible.
  • 1.5 Examples of incidents and results of non-compliance are included in presentation materials.
  • 1.6 Examples of successful cooperative arrangements are included in presentation materials.
  • 1.7 Presentation methods and information are structured to suit the specified objectives of the session, the needs of the participants and the size and location of the group.
2. Deliver session on fraud and corruption awareness
  • 2.1 Session is structured to facilitate the creation of opportunities for discussion of broad conceptual, ethical and legal issues surrounding fraud and corruption control.
  • 2.2 Objectives of the session, structure of the activities and other details are explained to participants to suit their level of understanding and experience, and feedback elicited.
  • 2.3 Materials and presentation techniques used are adapted to the particular audience and are effective and interesting.
  • 2.4 Materials are presented in such a way as to establish a positive response in the organisation and its clients regarding fraud and corruption control.
  • 2.5 Case studies are used for illustrative purposes, where possible.
  • 2.6 Models of excellence of fraud and corruption control in the public and private sectors are highlighted.
3. Review fraud and corruption control awareness session outcomes
  • 3.1 Participants are encouraged to provide feedback on all aspects of the awareness sessions.
  • 3.2 Suitability of the approach, the content and outcomes are reviewed as a guide for further activities.
  • 3.3 Own performance is reviewed against objectives and in response to participants' responses and comments.
  • 3.4 Advice is provided to appropriate people regarding possible future activities or amendments to organisational awareness strategy and programs, including identification of high risk areas for fraud and corruption activities.
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.
Fraud and corruption control awareness presentation may include:
in formal situations
addressing special interest groups or community groups
part of a broader induction program for agency staff
explaining procedures and guidelines
on-the-job coaching
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.
Units to be assessed together
Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil
Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil
Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:
PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service
PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector
PSPGOV402B Deliver and monitor service to clients
PSPREG402C Promote client compliance
Overview of evidence requirements
In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:
The knowledge requirements of this unit
the skill requirements of this unit
application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this summaries in this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)
presentation of fraud and corruption control awareness sessions in a range of (3 or more) contexts
Resources required to carry out assessment
These resources include:
fraud and corruption control guidelines
fraud investigation standards
public sector values and codes of conduct
legislation, procedures and protocols relating to fraud and corruption control
legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing
case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud and corruption control situations likely to be encountered
Where and how to assess evidence
Valid assessment of this unit requires:
a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when conducting fraud and corruption control awareness sessions, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine
presentation of fraud and corruption control awareness sessions in a range of (3 or more) contexts
Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:
people with disabilities
people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
women
young people
older people
people in rural and remote locations
Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:
case studies
demonstration
observation
portfolios
projects
questioning
scenarios
simulation or role plays
authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses
For consistency of assessment
Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C1148 PSPFRAU407A Deliver training in fraud control awareness Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AWW10 PSPFRU002 Conduct fraud control awareness sessions Unit of competency