Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
23/07/2026 2:21 AM AWST
23/07/2026 2:21 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Prepare for and implement change
Prepare for and implement change
Unit of competency
National Code
MSACMG701A
MSACMG701A
State Code
S7244
S7244
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
13/11/2012
Field of Education
080307 - Organisation Management
Original Release Date
13/11/2012
Nominal Hours
70
Description
This unit covers the establishment of the preconditions for the implementation of a change such as a 'step change' or a change resulting from a problem solving exercise such as a kaizen blitz. The unit can be applied to sub sections of an enterprise such as a team, area or department, or in the case of a small or medium sized manufacturer, to the whole enterprise.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Define the change
- 1.1. Determine the purpose of the change
- 1.2. Identify key change project personnel
- 1.3. Record the current state that the change is addressing
- 1.4. Develop a consensus view of the intended future state including indicators of a successful change
- 1.5. Develop an agreed statement of the solution
- 1.6. Identify the health, safety and environment (HSE) impacts of the change
- 1.7. Determine the scope of the change project including taking into account the impact of the solution on any codes of practice, standards, contracts, commercial or industrial agreements
- 1.8. Obtain sign off from key change project personnel
2. Identify personnel required to implement the change and their roles
- 2.1. Develop a high level change network map
- 2.2. Identify employees, suppliers or customers who may be required to implement the change
- 2.3. Identify other demands on these people during the change
- 2.4. Investigate priorities, synergies and conflicts
- 2.5. Take appropriate action to resolve conflicts
3. Assess and manage the change related risks
- 3.1. Identify organisational capacity for the change including available resources and ability to absorb any disruption during the change
- 3.2. Clarify specific risk dimensions for this change
- 3.3. Develop appropriate transition approach
4. Build high level change plans
- 4.1. Develop high level involvement plan
- 4.2. Develop high level communication plan to all stakeholders
- 4.3. Develop high level competency development plan for all implementers
- 4.4. Develop high level alignment plan
5. Implement and sustain the change
- 5.1. Implement change plans
- 5.2. Check change objectives have been met
- 5.3. Transfer ownership of post change operations from change agents where relevant
- 5.4. Ensure support structures are in place
- 5.5. Check alignments have been obtained
- 5.6. Check competencies have been developed and will be maintained
- 5.7. Ensure base line is defined for continuous improvement
- 5.8. Review project and capture learning from the project
- 5.9. Take action to sustain improvement by standardising
Change project personnel include :
the decision makers who determine if the proposed change may proceed and the key managers and implementers of the change
The current state is ideally defined by existing data. Where this is not available suitable proxies should be sought
Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used
All changes implemented should be at least neutral, or preferably beneficial, in their impact on health, safety and environment
High level change network includes groups involved in the change and who need to be committed to the change and include:
sponsors
cascading change sponsors
targets
agents
advocates
enablers
impeders
Organisation includes:
any part of a manufacturing or service organisation
companies, government bodies or other body of people aiming to produce a product to service a customer
Key change project personnel include:
project sponsors
cascading sponsors
relevant managers
change agents
Project sponsors include:
those people who proposed the project and are its main supporters
A cascading sponsor refers to:
a person who reports to a sponsor and so may be contributing on their behalf
A cascading sponsor works with delegated authority and responsibility
Risks include:
business risks for example over spending
market risk, for example, loss of market share
HSE risks
relationship risks, for example, to shareholders, employees, suppliers, customers or the community
Organisation capacity includes:
organisation history of implementing change
capability in change implementation
adaptability of people to change
demand for the change in the part of the organisation
Specific risk dimensions include :
impact of the solution - its potential for disruption to production, quality, delivery and budgets
readiness of people to accept the change including readiness to accept changes in role and responsibilities
availability of resources including financial, plant and equipment, and dedicated personnel
Transition approach will depend on the nature of the risks determined and will include:
transition style (top down/pilot/process focused/ delegated change)
degree of sponsorship to be cascaded
balance of engagement/involvement
internal and/or external resources
use of change to build organisation capacity
High level involvement plans aim to create ownership by involving groups in specific activities within defined constraints of:
objectives for involvement
decision parameters and
timing of involvement
The specific activities include :
problem/opportunity identification
solution design
implementation/transition planning
solution building
solution testing
solution piloting
training design
training delivery
communication roll out
solution roll out
Alignment plan ensures alignment and sustainability between:
policies, processes and procedures
incentives and rewards (key performance indicators (KPIs) and intended outcomes)
consequences and penalties for non-compliance
preventing pre-change behaviours and patterns recurring
Improvement may be sustained by including it in:
standard procedures and work instructions
standard practice
other relevant documents and practices
Team leader may include:
any person who may have either a permanent or an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of a team in a workplace
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Demonstrates skills and knowledge required to:
prepare for and deliver change.
In particular look for evidence of:
communication with all stakeholders
development of consensus
development and implementation of plans.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment may occur on the job or in an appropriately simulated environment. Access is required to real or appropriately simulated situations, including work areas, materials and equipment, and to information on workplace practices and OHS practices.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Method of assessment
Assessment must satisfy the endorsed assessment guidelines of the Manufacturing Training Package.
Assessment methods must confirm consistency and accuracy of performance (over time and in a range of workplace relevant contexts) together with application of underpinning knowledge.
Assessment methods must be by direct observation of tasks and include questioning on underpinning knowledge to ensure its correct interpretation and application.
Assessment may be applied under project related conditions (real or simulated) and require evidence of process.
Assessment must confirm a reasonable inference that competency is able not only to be satisfied under the particular circumstance, but is able to be transferred to other circumstances.
Assessment may be in conjunction with assessment of other units of competency where required.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Demonstrates skills and knowledge required to:
prepare for and deliver change.
In particular look for evidence of:
communication with all stakeholders
development of consensus
development and implementation of plans.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment may occur on the job or in an appropriately simulated environment. Access is required to real or appropriately simulated situations, including work areas, materials and equipment, and to information on workplace practices and OHS practices.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Method of assessment
Assessment must satisfy the endorsed assessment guidelines of the Manufacturing Training Package.
Assessment methods must confirm consistency and accuracy of performance (over time and in a range of workplace relevant contexts) together with application of underpinning knowledge.
Assessment methods must be by direct observation of tasks and include questioning on underpinning knowledge to ensure its correct interpretation and application.
Assessment may be applied under project related conditions (real or simulated) and require evidence of process.
Assessment must confirm a reasonable inference that competency is able not only to be satisfied under the particular circumstance, but is able to be transferred to other circumstances.
Assessment may be in conjunction with assessment of other units of competency where required.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD579 | MSS407001A | Prepare for and implement change | Unit of competency |