Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
23/07/2026 12:14 AM AWST
23/07/2026 12:14 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Introduce competitive manufacturing to a small or medium enterprise
Introduce competitive manufacturing to a small or medium enterprise
Unit of competency
National Code
MSACMS606A
MSACMS606A
State Code
W8984
W8984
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
06/05/2011
Field of Education
080315 - Project Management
Original Release Date
06/05/2011
Nominal Hours
60
Description
This unit covers the knowledge and skills required to introduce competitive manufacturing systems and tools into a small or medium manufacturing enterprise (SME)
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Analyse the current manufacturing systems and processes
- 1.1. Review the reasons for introducing competitive manufacturing and confirm the expected benefits with relevant stakeholders
- 1.2. Determine any internal limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive manufacturing
- 1.3. Determine any external limiting factors which will constrain the introduction of competitive manufacturing
- 1.4. Quantify expected returns from achieving the benefits of introducing competitive manufacturing
2. Develop strategic and tactical plans to introduce competitive manufacturing to the SME
- 2.1. Develop a strategic plan for the SME that takes into account the nature of its business and relationships with suppliers and customers
- 2.2. Where required, seek authority for the implementation of the strategic plan
- 2.3. Identify components of competitive strategy which will yield quick returns
- 2.4. Identify actions which will free up required resources to allow for the introduction of competitive manufacturing
- 2.5. Develop achievable tactical plans which are compatible with strategy
- 2.6. Consult with relevant stakeholders to confirm tactical plans
- 2.7. Prioritise plans for order of implementation
3. Implement competitive manufacturing
- 3.1. Implement priority tactical plan
- 3.2. Determine benefits from change
- 3.3. Use benefits from priority plan to assist in the implementation of further tactical plans
- 3.4. Review progress towards strategic objectives and adjust plans as appropriate in consultation with relevant stakeholders
Competitive manufacturing includes one or more of the following strategies:
Six sigma
Lean Manufacturing
Agile Manufacturing
Just in Time (JIT)
Supply chain management
Value Chain Management
Total Quality
Pro Active maintenance
Elimination of waste
Balanced Scorecard
Stakeholders may include:
managers
supervisors
employees
shareholders
Occupational Health and Safety Occupational Health and Safety OHS mechanisms/representatives
workplace consultative representatives
suppliers
customers
service providers
Internal limiting factors may include:
free cash
management time and expertise
machinery
work organisation and workforce skills and knowledge
External limiting factors may include lack of bargaining power or effective communication with:
suppliers
customers
financial institutions
other factors
Expected returns may include factors such as:
cost savings due to more consistent or higher quality
benefits from greater on-time delivery
savings from lower inventories, reduction in waste etc.
Components of competitive strategy may include any of the Competitive Manufacturing tools such as:
5S
continuous improvement/kaizen blitz
JIT/quick changeover/kanban
Actions which will free up required resources may include:
reduction of inventory
reduction of scrap
decreased throughput times.
Prioritise plans according to criteria such as:
greatest benefit
ease of implementation
best fit with strategy
available resources
Six sigma
Lean Manufacturing
Agile Manufacturing
Just in Time (JIT)
Supply chain management
Value Chain Management
Total Quality
Pro Active maintenance
Elimination of waste
Balanced Scorecard
Stakeholders may include:
managers
supervisors
employees
shareholders
Occupational Health and Safety Occupational Health and Safety OHS mechanisms/representatives
workplace consultative representatives
suppliers
customers
service providers
Internal limiting factors may include:
free cash
management time and expertise
machinery
work organisation and workforce skills and knowledge
External limiting factors may include lack of bargaining power or effective communication with:
suppliers
customers
financial institutions
other factors
Expected returns may include factors such as:
cost savings due to more consistent or higher quality
benefits from greater on-time delivery
savings from lower inventories, reduction in waste etc.
Components of competitive strategy may include any of the Competitive Manufacturing tools such as:
5S
continuous improvement/kaizen blitz
JIT/quick changeover/kanban
Actions which will free up required resources may include:
reduction of inventory
reduction of scrap
decreased throughput times.
Prioritise plans according to criteria such as:
greatest benefit
ease of implementation
best fit with strategy
available resources
Overview of assessment requirements
The person being assessed will need to be able to implement a competitive manufacturing approach in a SME environment.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a SME using, or intending to use competitive manufacturing.
What critical aspects of evidence is required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of the ability to analyse existing SME operations and to organise implementation of competitive manufacturing tools in a SME should be available.
In what context should assessment occur?
Assessment will need to occur in a SME which is implementing competitive manufacturing.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit could be assessed concurrently with other relevant units.
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
Evidence of the development of plans and the beginning of their implementation should generate sufficient evidence
The person being assessed will need to be able to implement a competitive manufacturing approach in a SME environment.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a SME using, or intending to use competitive manufacturing.
What critical aspects of evidence is required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of the ability to analyse existing SME operations and to organise implementation of competitive manufacturing tools in a SME should be available.
In what context should assessment occur?
Assessment will need to occur in a SME which is implementing competitive manufacturing.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit could be assessed concurrently with other relevant units.
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
Evidence of the development of plans and the beginning of their implementation should generate sufficient evidence
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD551 | MSS405007A | Introduce competitive systems and practices to a small or medium enterprise | Unit of competency |