Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 5:03 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Design a spatial data storage system

Design a spatial data storage system

Unit of competency
National Code
CPPSIS5043A
State Code
WE798
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
27/11/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
27/02/2013
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
27/02/2013
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit of competency specifies the outcomes required to design a spatial data storage system. It requires the ability to apply theoretical spatial concepts to a range of situations in order to determine, create and facilitate acceptance by users of a suitable spatial data and attribute storage system. Functions would be carried out within organisational guidelines.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Determine functional requirements.
  • 1.1 User needs are determined according to organisational requirements.
  • 1.2 An audit of existing spatial data sources is conducted to determine their suitability, useability, spatial data dependencies and adaptability.
  • 1.3 Requirements are recorded according to organisational guidelines.
  • 1.4 Feasibility of requirements is assessed against organisational budget, resources and priorities.
2 Create and test system design.
  • 2.1 A plan is developed based on functional requirements detailing spatial data flow dependencies.
  • 2.2 Appropriate spatial data storage environment is determined according to spatial data requirements and organisational resources.
  • 2.3 A schedule for the introduction of the system is developed and communicated to users.
  • 2.4 A prototype is created and tested or a standard format adopted to confirm that design meets functional requirements.
3 Formalise design acceptance.
  • 3.1 Relevant personnel are consulted and negotiated with to determine final design documentation.
  • 3.2 Final design documentation is created according to organisational guidelines.
  • 3.3 Acceptance is obtained from all stakeholders as appropriate.
4 Review the suitability of the spatial data storage system.
  • 4.1 Users are canvassed regarding the effectiveness of the spatial data storage system to identify changes needed.
  • 4.2 Feedback is analysed and appropriate changes are implemented.
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the performance criteria is detailed below. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.
Existing spatial data sources may include:
custom made
external
internal
off the shelf.
Spatial data dependencies may include:
attribute-related spatial datasets
coordinate system
datum
hardware.
Organisational guidelines may include:
code of ethics
company policy
legislation relevant to the work or service function
manuals
OHS policies and procedures
personnel practices and guidelines outlining work roles and responsibilities.
Functional requirements refer to:
system deliverables.
Spatial data flow may include:
objective description of the business guidelines relating to functional requirements.
Spatial data storage environmentmay include:
electronic spatial databases
field book
hard copy
map repositories.
Relevant personnelmay include:
managers
supervisors
technical staff
users.
Final design documentationmay include:
digital
hard copy.
Acceptance may include:
contract
exchange of letters
memorandum of understanding
signed copy of report
verbal confirmation.
Spatial data storage system may include:
digital
hard copy.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.
Overview of assessment
This unit of competency could be assessed on its own or in combination with other units relevant to the job function, for example CPPSIS5038A Develop a complex spatial and aspatial database.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of:
examining suitability of existing arrangements
operational knowledge in a broad range of areas relating to data storage and knowledge management
determining requirements of spatial data storage.
Specific resources for assessment
Resource implications for assessment include access to:
assessment instruments, including personal planner and assessment record book
assignment instructions, work plans and schedules, policy documents and duty statements
registered training provider of assessment services
relevant guidelines, regulations and codes of practice
suitable venue and equipment.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and assessment support when required.
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Context of assessment
Holistic: based on the performance criteria, evidence guide, range statement, and required skills and knowledge.
Method of assessment
Demonstrated over a period of time and observed by the assessor (or assessment team working together to conduct the assessment).
Demonstrated competency in a range of situations, that may include customer/workplace interruptions and involvement in related activities normally experienced in the workplace.
Obtained by observing activities in the field and reviewing induction information. If this is not practicable, observation in realistic simulated environments may be substituted.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment requires that the clients’ objectives and industry expectations are met. If the clients’ objectives are narrowly defined or not representative of industry needs, it may be necessary to refer to portfolio case studies of a variety of surveying and spatial information services requirements to assess competency.
Oral questioning or written assessment and hypothetical situations (scenarios) may be used to assess underpinning knowledge (in assessment situations where the candidate is offered a preference between oral questioning or written assessment, questions are to be identical).
Supplementary evidence may be obtained from relevant authenticated correspondence from existing supervisors, team leaders or specialist training staff.
All practical demonstration must adhere to the safety and environmental regulations relevant to each State or Territory.
Where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (recognition of current competencies [RCC] or recognition of prior learning [RPL]), the evidence provided will need to be authenticated and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time.
In all cases where practical assessment is used it will be combined with targeted questioning to assess the underpinning knowledge.
Assessment processes will be appropriate to the language and literacy levels of the candidate and any cultural issues that may affect responses to the questions, and will reflect the requirements of the competency and the work being performed.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
D1523 CPPSIS5013A Design a spatial data storage system Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AXF34 CPPSIS5043 Design spatial data storage systems Unit of competency