Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 3:11 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Develop high-level object-oriented class specifications

Develop high-level object-oriented class specifications

Unit of competency
National Code
ICAA5049B
State Code
D0011
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
08/07/2010
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
15/03/2010
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
15/03/2010
Nominal Hours
45
Description
This unit defines the competency required to analyse requirements and produce a set of high level object-oriented class specifications.There may be benefit in concurrent learning with the following units:ICAA5050B Develop detailed component specifications from project specificationsNo licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Analyse behaviour of objects
  • 1.1. Analyse behaviour scenarios and prepare documentation according to standards
  • 1.2. Identify classes, objects and abstract data types according to requirements
  • 1.3. Prepare class, object, module and process diagrams according to specifications
2. Prepare state model
  • 2.1. Analyse data requirements and iterate data flows
  • 2.2. Prepare state transition diagrams according to standards
  • 2.3. Improve abstract data types and specifications
3. Describe roles and responsibilities of classes
  • 3.1. Review functional requirements, assign responsibilities and update class structures
  • 3.2. Specify interface and class communication requirements
  • 3.3. Prepare interaction diagrams according to standards
4. Iterate and review the object model
  • 4.1. Review current object model, class functionality and data transformation
  • 4.2. Identify and develop class relationships, priorities and inheritance hierarchy
  • 4.3. Review class service requirements and initial test criteria
  • 4.4. Identify object processes and reuse classes
  • 4.5. Document model and forward to appropriate person
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Documentation may follow:
ISO/IEC/AS standards
audit trails
naming standards
version control
project management templates and report writing
maintaining equipment inventory
client training
satisfaction reports
Standards may include:
ISO/IEC/AS standards
organisational standards
project standards (for further information refer to the Standards Australia website at: www.standards.com.au)
Requirements may be in reference to:
business
system
application
network
people in the organisation
Specifications may include but are not limited to:
technical requirements
user problem statement
current system functionality
Appropriate person may include:
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm sufficient knowledge of object-oriented techniques.
Assessment must confirm the ability to specify and model abstract data types. Specifications need to be deliverable. Assessment must confirm the interface between classes and objects.

To demonstrate competency in this unit the learner will require access to:
Simulated case study
UML modelling tool
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.

Assessment must ensure:
The demonstration of competency may also require self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.
Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.

Competency in this unit should to be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.
Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills.
The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICAA5050B Develop detailed component specifications from project specifications

An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas
Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements
Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations
Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters
Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C8651 ICAA5049A Develop high level object oriented class specifications Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
D8036 ICAPRG524A Develop high-level object-oriented class specifications Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
7538 52046 Diploma of Interactive Games Development Accredited course
7547 52213 Diploma of Interactive Games Development Accredited course