Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
23/07/2026 12:56 AM AWST
23/07/2026 12:56 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Manage change to organisational electronic technology systems
Manage change to organisational electronic technology systems
Unit of competency
National Code
MTMBUS801A
MTMBUS801A
State Code
D8746
D8746
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
Field of Education
080399 - Business And Management, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
Nominal Hours
100
Description
This unit covers the skills and knowledge required to improve business outcomes through implementing the introduction of, or upgrades to, advanced electronic technologies. No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of endorsement.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Prepare organisational change management strategy for implementation of advanced electronic technologies
- 1.1. Proposed changes are analysed in relation to current operational practices, infrastructure and the strategic plan.
- 1.2. Identified changes are evaluated, costed and prioritised.
- 1.3. Risks associated with implementation are identified, evaluated and managed.
- 1.4. Implementation strategies are developed, including change management and communication strategies.
- 1.5. Implementation team is engaged, assembled and briefed.
2. Manage implementation
- 2.1. Implementation strategies are communicated to stakeholders and timelines and accountabilities clarified.
- 2.2. Progress of implementation against planned milestones is monitored, recorded and reported.
- 2.3. Potential risks to successful completion are identified and managed through consultation with stakeholders and review of testing outcomes.
- 2.4. Implementation strategy is reviewed and revised, as necessary.
- 2.5. Installation is finalised according to implementation strategy and organisational procedures.
- 2.6. Training programs needed to support new technologies are identified and implemented.
3. Evaluate implementation outcomes
- 3.1. Implementation process is reviewed and evaluated.
- 3.2. Implementation team is debriefed.
- 3.3. Outcomes of implementation process are assessed against organisation requirements.
- 3.4. Project outcomes are reported to key stakeholders.
4. Develop and implement ongoing management processes
- 4.1. Business processes required for ongoing electronic technology management are developed.
- 4.2. Business processes required for ongoing electronic technology management are implemented.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Proposed changes may include:
e-commerce systems
electronic messaging systems
implementation of a new information management system
system hardware upgrade
mobile computing devices (e.g. handheld devices, mobile computers, personal digital assistants, handheld data capture systems and mobile cellular telephones).
Risks may include
damage to property/equipment
environmental
equipment/system failures
financial/economic loss/failure
industrial disputation
market changes
microbiological contamination
natural disasters
OH&S including disease
political events
product failure
professional incompetence
security failure (e.g. criminal or terrorist activities)
supplier failures.
Implementation strategies may address:
change management strategies to engage users
contingency arrangements
developing a project team
financial management
identifying and seconding project personnel
timelines and project stages
product testing and trial regimes
project milestones
quality requirements
reporting requirements
risk management requirements
stakeholder consultation, familiarisation and training strategies.
Stakeholders may include:
business partners
customers
executive management
other employees
public
public agencies, especially regulators
shareholders
suppliers.
Business processes may include:
access and equity principles and practices
business and performance plans
collaborative or partnership arrangements
confidentiality requirements
defined resource parameters
ethical standards
existing technology, systems and processes
goals, objectives, plans, systems and processes
legal and organisational policies, guidelines and requirements
OH&S policies, procedures and programs
quality and continuous improvement processes and standards
Quality Assurance (QA) or procedures manuals
recording and reporting procedures
security requirements
team and business unit structures and focus.
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Proposed changes may include:
e-commerce systems
electronic messaging systems
implementation of a new information management system
system hardware upgrade
mobile computing devices (e.g. handheld devices, mobile computers, personal digital assistants, handheld data capture systems and mobile cellular telephones).
Risks may include
damage to property/equipment
environmental
equipment/system failures
financial/economic loss/failure
industrial disputation
market changes
microbiological contamination
natural disasters
OH&S including disease
political events
product failure
professional incompetence
security failure (e.g. criminal or terrorist activities)
supplier failures.
Implementation strategies may address:
change management strategies to engage users
contingency arrangements
developing a project team
financial management
identifying and seconding project personnel
timelines and project stages
product testing and trial regimes
project milestones
quality requirements
reporting requirements
risk management requirements
stakeholder consultation, familiarisation and training strategies.
Stakeholders may include:
business partners
customers
executive management
other employees
public
public agencies, especially regulators
shareholders
suppliers.
Business processes may include:
access and equity principles and practices
business and performance plans
collaborative or partnership arrangements
confidentiality requirements
defined resource parameters
ethical standards
existing technology, systems and processes
goals, objectives, plans, systems and processes
legal and organisational policies, guidelines and requirements
OH&S policies, procedures and programs
quality and continuous improvement processes and standards
Quality Assurance (QA) or procedures manuals
recording and reporting procedures
security requirements
team and business unit structures and focus.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
research and evaluate business and organisational impact of a proposed electronic technology system
capacity to analyse, develop and implement plans for the introduction of an electronic technology system with minimum interruption to the organisation's business processes
capacity to identify, analyse and address problems in a timely and effective manner.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
competence is consistently demonstrated over time, and over a range and variety of situations
access to required assessment facilities and resources.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third-party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate
review of applied projects or learning activities, such as those related to implementing electronic solutions for a specific business requirement
direct observation of contextual application of skills
oral or written questioning to assess knowledge of capabilities and limitations of infrastructure
review of research and evaluation of the electronic technology proposal.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example, with other units in the qualification in which this unit is packaged.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
research and evaluate business and organisational impact of a proposed electronic technology system
capacity to analyse, develop and implement plans for the introduction of an electronic technology system with minimum interruption to the organisation's business processes
capacity to identify, analyse and address problems in a timely and effective manner.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure:
competence is consistently demonstrated over time, and over a range and variety of situations
access to required assessment facilities and resources.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct questioning combined with review of portfolios of evidence and third-party workplace reports of on-the-job performance by the candidate
review of applied projects or learning activities, such as those related to implementing electronic solutions for a specific business requirement
direct observation of contextual application of skills
oral or written questioning to assess knowledge of capabilities and limitations of infrastructure
review of research and evaluation of the electronic technology proposal.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example, with other units in the qualification in which this unit is packaged.
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVW81 | AMPMGT807 | Manage change to organisational electronic technology systems | Unit of competency |