Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 10:34 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Plan spatial data collection and validation

Plan spatial data collection and validation

Unit of competency
National Code
CPPSIS5031A
State Code
WE786
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
27/11/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
27/02/2013
Field of Education
031199 - Geomatic Engineering, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
27/02/2013
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit of competency specifies the outcomes required to develop data collection and validation plans for new data. It requires the ability to evaluate spatial information to apply knowledge to plan future collection requirements. Functions would be carried out within organisational guidelines.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Scope spatial data acquisition requirements.
  • 1.1 Client instructions are analysed to determine specific needs and spatialdata requirements.
  • 1.2 Spatial data requirements and constraints are identified through consultation with client and outcomes are recorded according to organisational guidelines.
  • 1.3 A site assessment is conducted when necessary to clarify the acquisition requirements, and outcomes are recorded according to organisational guidelines.
2 Evaluate available collection options.
  • 2.1 Assessment of technical, financial, legal and resource implications of each available collection option is conducted to ensure preferred option meets written data specifications.
  • 2.2 Preferred option is selected on the basis of client needs and organisational capability and priorities.
  • 2.3 Assessment process is documented according to organisational guidelines.
3 Develop spatial data collection and validation plan.
  • 3.1 Project objectives, deliverables, constraints and principal work activities are defined and documented according to the written specifications.
  • 3.2 Identified risks, contingencies and resources, as well as full details of technology and techniques to be used to collect the spatial data in the specified format, are included in the plan.
  • 3.3 Spatial data validation process is specified in the plan to verify the integrity of the required spatial data.
  • 3.4 Where necessary, the plan is presented to client for confirmation and approval.
4 Communicate data acquisition requirements to relevant personnel.
  • 4.1 Written specifications of data to be acquired are communicated with relevant personnel, according to organisational guidelines.
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the performance criteria is detailed below. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.
Client instructions refer to description of outputs and may be contained in:
contracts
memos
tender briefs
verbal instructions
written instructions.
Spatial data requirements may include:
administration (e.g. postcodes, suburbs, and federal and state electoral counties)
analysis of environmental, land and geographic information
asset management
cartographic services
civil engineering
digital imagery
electricity
emergency services management
environmental datasets
GIS
integrated services - environmental, land and geographic related datasets
land ownership tenure system
local government
location-based services
global positioning
mapping facilities
site analysis
survey marks
sewerage
telecommunications
town planning
utility services such as water.
Constraints may include:
contractual arrangements
resource availability
time.
Client may include:
customers with routine or special requests
external to organisation
internal to organisation
regular and new customers, including:
business enterprises
government agencies
members of the public
suppliers.
Organisational guidelines may include:
code of ethics
company policy
legislation relevant to the work or service function
manuals
OHS policies and procedures
personnel practices and guidelines outlining work roles and responsibilities.
Collection options may include:
data logging
digitising theodolite
global position system
photogrammetry
remote sensing
scanning
sonar
survey
total station.
Project objectives may include:
agreed client requirements
written specifications.
Principal work activities refer to:
activity and sequence of activity determined to be appropriate in order to meet project objectives.
Written specifications refer to:
detailed technical description of the spatial data and its qualifiers.
Techniques may include:
field collection
data interrogation and manipulation.
Validation process means reflecting the true state of a test result, including tests for systematic distortions such as:
confounding bias
information/data bias
observational bias
recall bias
selection bias.
Integrity may include:
authenticity
relevance to the project.
Relevant personnel may include:
colleagues
company personnel
registered surveyors
staff or employee representatives
supervisors or line managers
suppliers
users.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.
Overview of assessment
This unit of competency could be assessed on its own or in combination with other units relevant to the job function, for example CPPSIS5032A Capture new spatial data, CPPSIS5035A Obtain and validate spatial data, CPPSIS5036A Integrate spatial datasets, CPPSIS5037A Maintain complex spatial data systems, and CPPSIS5038A Develop a complex spatial and aspatial database.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of:
applying qualitative and quantitative measurements for a project
assessing and acting upon contingencies
determining a collection and validation process based on thorough assessment of all relevant considerations
knowledge of spatial data applied to collection options.
Specific resources for assessment
Resource implications for assessment include access to:
assessment instruments, including personal planner and assessment record book
assignment instructions, work plans and schedules, policy documents and duty statements
registered training provider of assessment services
relevant guidelines, regulations and codes of practice
suitable venue and equipment.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and assessment support when required.
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Context of assessment
Holistic: based on the performance criteria, evidence guide, range statement, and required skills and knowledge.
Method of assessment
Demonstrated over a period of time and observed by the assessor (or assessment team working together to conduct the assessment).
Demonstrated competency in a range of situations, that may include customer/workplace interruptions and involvement in related activities normally experienced in the workplace.
Obtained by observing activities in the field and reviewing induction information. If this is not practicable, observation in realistic simulated environments may be substituted.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment requires that the clients’ objectives and industry expectations are met. If the clients’ objectives are narrowly defined or not representative of industry needs, it may be necessary to refer to portfolio case studies of a variety of SIS requirements to assess competency.
Oral questioning or written assessment and hypothetical situations (scenarios) may be used to assess underpinning knowledge (in assessment situations where the candidate is offered a preference between oral questioning or written assessment, questions are to be identical).
Supplementary evidence may be obtained from relevant authenticated correspondence from existing supervisors, team leaders or specialist training staff.
All practical demonstration must adhere to the safety and environmental regulations relevant to each State or Territory.
Where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (recognition of current competencies [RCC] or recognition of prior learning [RPL]), the evidence provided will need to be authenticated and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time.
In all cases where practical assessment is used it will be combined with targeted questioning to assess the underpinning knowledge.
Assessment processes will be appropriate to the language and literacy levels of the candidate and any cultural issues that may affect responses to the questions, and will reflect the requirements of the competency and the work being performed.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
D1511 CPPSIS5001A Plan spatial data collection and validation Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AXI65 CPPSIS5031 Plan spatial data collection Unit of competency