Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 2:42 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Monitor data for indicators of fraud

Monitor data for indicators of fraud

Unit of competency
National Code
PSPFRAU401B
State Code
C8121
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
3.00
Current Release Date
01/11/2012
View on TGA
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
07/07/2014
Field of Education
091105 - Police Studies
Original Release Date
07/07/2014
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit covers the collection of data from a wide variety of sources and its input into appropriate data management systems for interrogation to identify indicators of fraud and corruption. It includes collating and interrogating data and monitoring for indicators of fraud and corruption. Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption. In practice, monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, complying with legislation, exercising regulatory powers, etc.Related units of competency dealing with investigation, evidence, powers of arrest, etc are located in the Regulatory Competency field of the Training Package. No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Collate data
  • 1.1 Relevant data sources are identified and data is collected that is compatible, useful, relevant, reliable, valid and timely.
  • 1.2 Data is organised in prescribed form in accordance with the identified information needs and uses.
  • 1.3 Data is checked for accuracy, suitability and compliance with legal and privacy responsibilities and security.
  • 1.4 The need to liaise with specialists is determined and acted on in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.
  • 1.5 Ways to improve fraud and corruption control data content, interfaces and usefulness are monitored, and recommendations are made to supervisors and other stakeholders.
2. Interrogate data
  • 2.1 Quantitative and/or qualitative analyses are performed to obtain required outcomes in accordance with the purpose of each analysis.
  • 2.2 Analysis and description tools and techniques are selected appropriate to the nature of the information and the required outcome.
  • 2.3 Priority of data to be interrogated is determined in consultation with appropriate people, and work is organised accordingly.
  • 2.4 An understanding of the nature of the program or activity from which the data is obtained, the way in which the information is structured in the system and the likely indications of fraud and corruption activities are reflected in the analysis of material.
  • 2.5 Preliminary recommendations are expressed in the detail, format and timeframe required.
3. Monitor for indicators of fraud and corruption
  • 3.1 Fraud and corruption or possible fraud and corruption situations are identified, staff and systems alerted and actions initiated.
  • 3.2 Where indicators arise for which there are no precedents, information is referred to the appropriate people for further analysis.
  • 3.3 Trends indicating activities outside control limits are reported for further analysis and investigation.
  • 3.4 Checks are made for internal consistency and compliance with established structure, rules and authorities for accessing information.
  • 3.5 Variations from standards and guidelines are reported in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here.
Data may include:
electronic systems
paper-based systems
client data
other individuals and organisations
Stakeholders may include:
staff and senior management
clients
law enforcement agencies
organisations providing data
standards-setting organisations
Purposes of data analysis may include:
response to ongoing or individual requests for information from specified people to check for particular information
matching data as part of a random check
conducting a needs assessment for fraud and corruption prevention and awareness activities
generating and initiating fraud and corruption control activities
Actions resulting from data interrogation may include:
investigation or inquiry
legislative change
administrative change
policy change
improved referral to another organisation for investigation
Guidelines may include:
legislation and guidelines prepared by relevant standards-setting organisations
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.
Units to be assessed together
Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil
Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil
Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:
PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service
PSPGOV406B Gather and analyse information
PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector
PSPREG401C Exercise regulatory powers
PSPREG402C Promote client compliance
PSPREG415A Receive and validate data
Overview of evidence requirements
In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:
the knowledge requirements of this unit
the skill requirements of this unit
application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)
monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)
Resources required to carry out assessment
These resources include:
fraud and corruption control guidelines
fraud investigation standards
public sector values and codes of conduct
organisational procedures and manuals
legislation, procedures and protocols relating to fraud and corruption control
legislation and procedures relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing
case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of fraud/corruption situations likely to be encountered
Where and how to assess evidence
Valid assessment of this unit requires:
a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine
monitoring of data for indicators of fraud and corruption in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)
Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:
people with disabilities
people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
women
young people
older people
people in rural and remote locations
Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:
case studies
demonstration
observation
portfolios
projects
questioning
scenarios
simulation or role plays
authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses
For consistency of assessment
Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and/or apply the competency in different situations or environments.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C1142 PSPFRAU401A Interrogate data Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AWW13 PSPFRU001 Monitor data for indicators of fraud Unit of competency