Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 8:12 AM AWST
22/07/2026 8:12 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Develop manufacturing related business plans
Develop manufacturing related business plans
Unit of competency
National Code
MSACMS603A
MSACMS603A
State Code
W8981
W8981
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
20/08/2012
Field of Education
080301 - Business Management
Original Release Date
20/08/2012
Nominal Hours
60
Description
This unit covers the knowledge and skills needed to develop business plans in a competitive manufacturing environment.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Determine purpose of plan
- 1.1. Confirm reason for developing plan and expected outcomes from plan
- 1.2. Confirm purpose of plan with all relevant stakeholders
- 1.3. Check expected outcomes from plan with overall strategic plan for organisation
- 1.4. Identify any potential areas for conflict between proposed plan and strategic directions
- 1.5. Negotiate with relevant stakeholders to resolve issues
2. Develop objectives and strategies
- 2.1. Draft objectives for business plan
- 2.2. Draft strategies to achieve these objectives
- 2.3. Determine implications for value chain
- 2.4. Determine capital or workplace layout/organisation implications for objectives and strategies
3. Develop plans to meet objectives and strategies
- 3.1. Negotiate with relevant stakeholders over implications for objectives and strategies
- 3.2. In liaison with relevant stakeholders, develop plans to meet objectives
- 3.3. Determine relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for plan
- 3.4. Check Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are appropriate for purpose of plan
- 3.5. Check plan will deliver planned purpose
- 3.6. Map plan to changed value chain
- 3.7. Adjust plan to optimise value chain
- 3.8. Validate plan with relevant stakeholders
4. Monitor the implementation of the plan
- 4.1. Release plan for implementation
- 4.2. Check the key progress points against the key stages of the plan
- 4.3. Note any discrepancies
- 4.4. Take appropriate action to ensure correct implementation of plan
Competitive manufacturing is used to describe the range of systemic manufacturing practice concepts and approaches. It covers but is not limited to:
lean manufacturing
agile manufacturing
preventative and predictive maintenance approaches
monitoring and data gathering systems such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP), and proprietary systems such as SAP
statistical process control systems including six sigma and three sigma
Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull related manufacturing control systems
supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis
other continuous improvement systems.
Competitive manufacturing should be interpreted so as to take into account the stage of implementation of competitive manufacturing approaches, the enterprise's size and work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and manufacturing sector.
Plan may include any sort of business plan and may emphasise any of the areas for sub-plans over the others.
Objectives may include:
quality
occupational health and safety (OHS)
environment
competitive manufacturing practices
human, physical, financial and environmental/resource.
Objectives and strategies may include:
human and industrial relations
material/component and resources
sustainable environmental practices
sales and marketing
financial.
Relevant stakeholders may include:
other team members
other workers
management
technical specialists
other members of the value chain.
lean manufacturing
agile manufacturing
preventative and predictive maintenance approaches
monitoring and data gathering systems such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP), and proprietary systems such as SAP
statistical process control systems including six sigma and three sigma
Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull related manufacturing control systems
supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis
other continuous improvement systems.
Competitive manufacturing should be interpreted so as to take into account the stage of implementation of competitive manufacturing approaches, the enterprise's size and work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and manufacturing sector.
Plan may include any sort of business plan and may emphasise any of the areas for sub-plans over the others.
Objectives may include:
quality
occupational health and safety (OHS)
environment
competitive manufacturing practices
human, physical, financial and environmental/resource.
Objectives and strategies may include:
human and industrial relations
material/component and resources
sustainable environmental practices
sales and marketing
financial.
Relevant stakeholders may include:
other team members
other workers
management
technical specialists
other members of the value chain.
Overview of assessment requirements
The person will be able to develop a plan which successfully delivers plan objectives.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a workplace implementing competitive manufacturing strategies is required. No other specific resources are required.
What critical aspects of evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of having developed a plan which meets its objectives.
In what context should assessment occur?
Assessment will need to occur in a competitive manufacturing organisation and where the individual is undertaking business planning or by project or case study.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit may be assessed concurrently with appropriate units.
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
Evidence from one significant plan should be sufficient, or alternatively from several smaller business plans.
The person will be able to develop a plan which successfully delivers plan objectives.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a workplace implementing competitive manufacturing strategies is required. No other specific resources are required.
What critical aspects of evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of having developed a plan which meets its objectives.
In what context should assessment occur?
Assessment will need to occur in a competitive manufacturing organisation and where the individual is undertaking business planning or by project or case study.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit may be assessed concurrently with appropriate units.
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the Elements, Performance Criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
Evidence from one significant plan should be sufficient, or alternatively from several smaller business plans.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| W2569 | MCMS603A | Develop manufacturing related business plans | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD548 | MSS405004A | Develop business plans in an organisation implementing competitive systems and practices | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3169 | 91470NSW | Advanced Diploma of Product Design And Innovation | Accredited course |
| D552 | MSS50111 | Diploma of Sustainable Operations | Qualification |