Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 4:49 AM AWST
22/07/2026 4:49 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Repair or overhaul aircraft pulse system components
Repair or overhaul aircraft pulse system components
Unit of competency
National Code
MEA282A
MEA282A
State Code
D4452
D4452
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
12/01/2012
Field of Education
031503 - Aircraft Maintenance Engineering
Original Release Date
12/01/2012
Nominal Hours
60
Description
This unit of competency is part of the Avionic Certificate IV (Component Workshop Maintenance Stream) training pathway. It covers the competencies required to repair or overhaul components of aircraft pulse systems. Repair of circuit boards is covered by MEA262B Modify/repair single layer printed circuit boards and MEA263B Modify/repair multi-layer printed circuit boards. This unit is used in workplaces that operate under the airworthiness regulatory systems of the ADF and CASA.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Determine requirements
- 1.1. Pulse system component defect reports (removal tags) or customer order are correctly interpreted and matched by part and serial numbers
- 1.2. Circuitry is correctly prepared and connected to the applicable test equipment and is functionally tested or cycled through the prescribed test procedures in accordance with the maintenance documentation for evidence of serviceability or malfunction
- 1.3. Modification status is clearly established to assist in determining the overhaul requirements for the components
- 1.4. Extent of overhaul or repair is correctly identified and documented
2. Troubleshoot pulse system components
- 2.1. Available information from maintenance records and inspection and test results is used, where necessary, to assist in fault determination
- 2.2. Maintenance manual fault diagnosis guides and logic processes are used to ensure efficient and accurate troubleshooting
- 2.3. Faults are located and the causes of the faults are clearly identified and correctly recorded in maintenance documentation, where required
- 2.4. Fault rectification requirements are determined
3. Dismantle and inspect pulse system components
- 3.1. Component parts are dismantled in accordance with maintenance manuals
- 3.2. Component parts are assessed for serviceability in accordance with the relevant maintenance documentation
- 3.3. Parts requiring specialist repair are tagged and repair instructions are accurately specified
- 3.4. Parts lists are compiled and processed in accordance with standard enterprise procedures
4. Repair and/or modify pulse system components
- 4.1. Component parts are repaired or replaced in accordance with the relevant maintenance documentation
- 4.2. Modification of components or parts is undertaken, where required, by relevant manufacturers' bulletins or procedures
5. Assemble, test and adjust pulse system components
- 5.1. Assembly of component parts is carried out in accordance with specified tolerances and the applicable maintenance documents
- 5.2. Assembled components are tested and adjusted/aligned in accordance with the applicable maintenance documentation using the appropriate test equipment
- 5.3. Required maintenance documentation and modification records are completed and processed in accordance with standard enterprise procedures
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Note
Range statements listed below are numbered to facilitate specification of the assessment requirements included in the Evidence Guide
Pulse system components
Pulse system components may be from the following aircraft systems:
1. Weather radar, search radar and weapons system radar
2. DME and TACAN
3. Doppler navigation
4. Air traffic transponder
5. Radio altimeter
6. ACAS
Application
Application of this unit may relate to:
scheduled or unscheduled maintenance
individual or team-related activities
complex testing and adjusting of components, and where this is undertaken, may be carried out under supervision at the appropriate level
Procedures and requirements
Procedures and requirements refer to industry standard procedures specified by manufacturers, regulatory authorities or the enterprise
Note
Range statements listed below are numbered to facilitate specification of the assessment requirements included in the Evidence Guide
Pulse system components
Pulse system components may be from the following aircraft systems:
1. Weather radar, search radar and weapons system radar
2. DME and TACAN
3. Doppler navigation
4. Air traffic transponder
5. Radio altimeter
6. ACAS
Application
Application of this unit may relate to:
scheduled or unscheduled maintenance
individual or team-related activities
complex testing and adjusting of components, and where this is undertaken, may be carried out under supervision at the appropriate level
Procedures and requirements
Procedures and requirements refer to industry standard procedures specified by manufacturers, regulatory authorities or the enterprise
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to inspect, test, troubleshoot and align/adjust circuitry of components from aircraft pulse systems in accordance with maintenance manuals and regulatory/industry procedures while observing all relevant safety precautions.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The underlying skills inherent in this unit should be transferable across a range of testing, aligning and troubleshooting applications (including the timely involvement of supervisors or other trades) associated with aircraft pulse system component repair and overhaul. Ability to interpret inspection and testing procedures and specifications (allowable limits) and apply them in practice is critical. It is essential that testing procedures, cleanliness requirements and safety precautions applicable to the system being maintained are fully observed, understood and complied with.
Evidence of transferability of skills and knowledge related to testing, aligning and troubleshooting is essential. This may be demonstrated through application across a representative range of the components listed in Groups 1 to 6 in the Range Statement. The application of testing procedures should also clearly indicate knowledge of system operation before undertaking any action. Knowledge of system operation and the relationship of individual components will be necessary to supplement evidence of ability to troubleshoot component faults. The work plan should take account of applicable safety and quality requirements in accordance with the industry and regulatory standards. Use of high precision, high reliability soldering techniques and handling of components, including application of anti-static equipment, must be demonstrated.
A person cannot be assessed as competent until it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the workplace assessor that the relevant elements of the unit of competency are being achieved under routine supervision on a representative range of components from two or more of Groups 1 to 6 in the Range Statement. This shall be established via the records in the Log of Industrial Experience and Achievement or, where appropriate, an equivalent Industry Evidence Guide.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Competency should be assessed in the work environment, using tools and equipment specified in maintenance documentation. It is also expected that general and special purpose tools and test equipment would be used where appropriate.
Method of assessment
Assessment should be made across a sufficient number of components to establish the ability to apply attained skills and knowledge across the full range of pulse system components with the aid of applicable maintenance manuals and data.
Guidance information for assessment
Overview of assessment
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to inspect, test, troubleshoot and align/adjust circuitry of components from aircraft pulse systems in accordance with maintenance manuals and regulatory/industry procedures while observing all relevant safety precautions.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The underlying skills inherent in this unit should be transferable across a range of testing, aligning and troubleshooting applications (including the timely involvement of supervisors or other trades) associated with aircraft pulse system component repair and overhaul. Ability to interpret inspection and testing procedures and specifications (allowable limits) and apply them in practice is critical. It is essential that testing procedures, cleanliness requirements and safety precautions applicable to the system being maintained are fully observed, understood and complied with.
Evidence of transferability of skills and knowledge related to testing, aligning and troubleshooting is essential. This may be demonstrated through application across a representative range of the components listed in Groups 1 to 6 in the Range Statement. The application of testing procedures should also clearly indicate knowledge of system operation before undertaking any action. Knowledge of system operation and the relationship of individual components will be necessary to supplement evidence of ability to troubleshoot component faults. The work plan should take account of applicable safety and quality requirements in accordance with the industry and regulatory standards. Use of high precision, high reliability soldering techniques and handling of components, including application of anti-static equipment, must be demonstrated.
A person cannot be assessed as competent until it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the workplace assessor that the relevant elements of the unit of competency are being achieved under routine supervision on a representative range of components from two or more of Groups 1 to 6 in the Range Statement. This shall be established via the records in the Log of Industrial Experience and Achievement or, where appropriate, an equivalent Industry Evidence Guide.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Competency should be assessed in the work environment, using tools and equipment specified in maintenance documentation. It is also expected that general and special purpose tools and test equipment would be used where appropriate.
Method of assessment
Assessment should be made across a sufficient number of components to establish the ability to apply attained skills and knowledge across the full range of pulse system components with the aid of applicable maintenance manuals and data.
Guidance information for assessment
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUE66 | MEA282 | Repair or overhaul aircraft pulse system components | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D743 | MEA40611 | Certificate IV in Aeroskills (Avionics) | Qualification |