Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 7:24 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Manage the testing process

Manage the testing process

Unit of competency
National Code
ICAT5082B
State Code
D0237
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
08/07/2010
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/11/2007
Field of Education
029999 - Information Technology, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
29/11/2007
Nominal Hours
15
Description
This unit defines the competency required to effectively manage and administer the end to end testing process including test definition, execution and reporting.No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Develop test schedule
  • 1.1. Determine testing requirements and objectives
  • 1.2. Review test plan, where available
  • 1.3. Develop testing timeline and allocate resources
  • 1.4. Document test objectives and schedule according to test procedures and distribute to appropriate person
  • 1.5. Obtain feedback and incorporate relevant changes
2. Complete test procedures
  • 2.1. Copy necessary code into the testing environment
  • 2.2. Allocate and manage personnel carrying out the testing process
  • 2.3. Administer alterations/changes to the code
  • 2.4. Integrate code into production environment
3. Review the completeness and accuracy of the system
  • 3.1. Administer full system test to ensure suitability of the system
  • 3.2. Document outcomes of system test for use in subsequent development phases
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Appropriate person may include:
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm sufficient knowledge of entire system requirements, both development and implementation in order to effectively manage and administer a full testing process.
Assessment must confirm ability to successfully review and accept or reject a pre-implemented system based on test outcomes.

To demonstrate competency in this unit the person will require access to:
Human resources assigned and in place
Requirements and design documentation
Test plan
All test hardware and environments in place and free for system test use
System/application suitable for testing
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The person will have clearly identified the results of the systems tests. The system test should clearly confirm that:
Functionality, delivered by the development team, is as specified by the business in the business design specification document and the requirements documentation
Software is of high quality; the software will replace/support the intended business functions and achieves the standards required by the organisation for the development of new systems
Software delivered interfaces correctly with existing systems

If the system test does not confirm the above, then the person will have documented how the system has not met the test criteria.

The system test is a fully functional exercising of the system to be implemented, as such, all resources necessary to execute the entire system will be required.

Effective test management should ensure that all testing is carried out on the same platform as the completed system. Scheduled testing should be on the production platform and the production environment will be required as part of test preparation.

The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.

Assessment must ensure:
The demonstration of competency may also require self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.

Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.

Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.

Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended.

An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas
Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements
Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations
Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters
Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C8838 ICAT5082A Manage the testing process Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
D8101 ICASAS515A Manage the testing process Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
C869 ICA50305 Diploma of Information Technology (Systems Administration) Qualification