Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 10:27 PM AWST
22/07/2026 10:27 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Validate quality and completeness of system design specifications
Validate quality and completeness of system design specifications
Unit of competency
National Code
ICAICT503A
ICAICT503A
State Code
D7886
D7886
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
08/11/2011
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
08/11/2011
Nominal Hours
20
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to check the system specifications against outcomes and quality standards.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Determine audit criteria
- 1.1 Investigate the system or product for which the quality audit is being performed to understand its functionality
- 1.2 Determine the objectives to be achieved by the quality audit
- 1.3 Determine the scope of the quality audit
- 1.4 Develop a list of audit criteria and quality benchmarks
- 1.5 Develop a metric to classify the audit criteria
- 1.6 Determine the audit technique or methodology to be followed
- 1.7 Examine and detail the resources available to carry out the audit
- 1.8 Document the objectives, scope, criteria, technique and resources in an audit plan
2. Audit aspects of the final system
- 2.1 Use the audit criteria to collect evidence about the functionality and quality of the final system, including documentation
- 2.2 Use a checklist to monitor audit progress
- 2.3 Document audit outcomes as the audit progresses
3. Review and confirm contract and specifications
- 3.1 Review system contract against audit outcomes
- 3.2 Compare system functionality against audit outcomes and system contract
- 3.3 Identify items of noncompliance where audit outcomes do not meet performance targets or fall short of contract requirements
- 3.4 Review system procedures for corrective action
- 3.5 Document items of non-compliance and proposed corrective action
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
System may include:
active server page (ASP)
applications
databases
gateways
internet service provider (ISP)
operating system
servers.
Quality benchmarks may include:
benchmarks that cover:
cost savings
performance
quality
technical matters
relevant quality standards:
AS3925.1-1994 Software quality assurance - plans
NZS14102:1998 Information technology guideline for evaluation and selection of CASE tools
AS/NZS4258:1994 Software user documentation process
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 12207:1997 Information technology - Software life cycle processes.
Metric may include:
capacity
input
output
performance
quality
value metrics.
Documentation may follow:
audit trails
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and Australian Standards (AS) standards
naming standards
project management templates
report writing principles
version control.
Requirements may refer to:
application
business
network
people in the organisation
system.
System may include:
active server page (ASP)
applications
databases
gateways
internet service provider (ISP)
operating system
servers.
Quality benchmarks may include:
benchmarks that cover:
cost savings
performance
quality
technical matters
relevant quality standards:
AS3925.1-1994 Software quality assurance - plans
NZS14102:1998 Information technology guideline for evaluation and selection of CASE tools
AS/NZS4258:1994 Software user documentation process
AS/NZS ISO/IEC 12207:1997 Information technology - Software life cycle processes.
Metric may include:
capacity
input
output
performance
quality
value metrics.
Documentation may follow:
audit trails
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and Australian Standards (AS) standards
naming standards
project management templates
report writing principles
version control.
Requirements may refer to:
application
business
network
people in the organisation
system.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
determine audit criteria and conduct audit
review system procedures for non-compliance
specify corrective actions.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
audit tools
documentation guidelines
relevant standards and benchmarks
service level agreement (SLA)
archive policy
acceptance criteria
IT security specifications
live system, including database, system files and designed interface
technical specifications of system.
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct observation of candidate undertaking an audit
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of requirements for identifying audit criteria
review of documented items of non-compliance and proposed corrective action prepared by candidate.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
determine audit criteria and conduct audit
review system procedures for non-compliance
specify corrective actions.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
audit tools
documentation guidelines
relevant standards and benchmarks
service level agreement (SLA)
archive policy
acceptance criteria
IT security specifications
live system, including database, system files and designed interface
technical specifications of system.
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct observation of candidate undertaking an audit
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of requirements for identifying audit criteria
review of documented items of non-compliance and proposed corrective action prepared by candidate.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D2793 | ICAA5054C | Validate quality and completeness of system design specifications | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUU56 | ICTICT503 | Validate quality and completeness of system design specifications | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D567 | ICA50111 | Diploma of Information Technology | Qualification |
| D573 | ICA50711 | Diploma of Software Development | Qualification |
| D572 | ICA50611 | Diploma of Website Development | Qualification |