Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 1:29 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Apply ergonomic principles to accessible building design and fitout

Apply ergonomic principles to accessible building design and fitout

Unit of competency
National Code
CPPACC5006A
State Code
W9800
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Transition (Replaced)
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
07/04/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
15/09/2014
Field of Education
030905 - Building Services Engineering
Original Release Date
15/09/2014
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit specifies the competency required to use knowledge of human movement and the skills required to determine human posture and body strength and apply this information to the design of the environment in which people live and work.The unit covers the application of basic ergonomic data derived from a defined human population to the design of accessible workplaces and living spaces. The design of accessible workplaces will maximise the sequencing of tasks to ensure body movements are efficient in terms of the conservation of work.The measurement of the components of ergonomic competence of individuals and the application of this information to the design of an accessible environment required by the individual shall be demonstrated.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1Determine the range of human posture and body strength values within a defined population.
  • 1.1 Key working postures of the human body are identified accurately.1.2 Appropriate methodology for measuring key ergonomic features is selected.1.3 Ergonomicdata is recorded in a recognised format appropriate for retrieval and statistical analysis in accordance with organisational requirements.
2Compare ergonomic data used in published architectural design documents with ergonomic data derived through measurement of a defined population.
  • 2.1 Published architectural design data is compared and verified against ergonomic data derived through measurement of a defined population.2.2 Ergonomic data that proves different to published architectural design data is analysed to assess the extent of difference, possible causes for the difference and likely consequences of altering published architectural design data.
3Apply the principles of ergonomics to the design of workplaces.
  • 3.1 The work processes undertaken in various locations are analysed to determine economical task sequencing.3.2 Facilities are designed to locate the most essential elements in close proximity to support their functionality.
4Identify the critical ergonomic features impacting on the ability of a person with a disability to work and function independently.
  • 4.1 The level of functioning of a person with a disability is determined in consultation with the client.4.2 Ergonomic features relevant to the ability of a person with a disability to work and function independently are identified in consultation with the client, using ergonomic methodology in accordance with organisational requirements.4.3 Situations requiring specialist advice are identified and assistance is sought as required in accordance with organisational requirements.4.4 Appropriate strategies for maximising the ability of a person with a disability to work and function independently are identified.4.5 Identified strategies are communicated to the appropriate people for the design, construction and fitout of the client's premises.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the performance criteria is detailed below. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.
Working posture is defined as:
the posture a person adopts when performing a particular task, determined by the relationship between the dimensions of the person's body and the dimensions of the various items in his/her workplace.
Ergonomic features may include:
body clearances
reach ranges
zones of convenient reach
joint ranges
working posture
vision - head and neck posture
working height
posture and strength.
Ergonomic data applies to:
the data derived from the measurement of ergonomic features.
Organisational requirements may be outlined and reflected in:
access and equity policy, principles and practices
business and performance plans
client service policies, procedures and standards
codes of conduct and codes of practice
communication channels and reporting procedures
communication of services offered
complaint and dispute resolution procedures
compliance with legislation, codes and workplace standards
continuous improvement processes and standards
defined resource parameters
duty of care
employer and employee rights and responsibilities
ethical standards
legal policies and guidelines
OHS policies, procedures and programs
organisational mission statement, goals, objectives, plans, systems and processes
policies and procedures relating to the setting of fees and the negotiation and management of contracts

policies and procedures relating to own role, responsibilities and delegation
privacy and confidentiality policies and procedures
quality assurance and procedures manuals
records and information management systems and processes
style guides and other guides used to prepare documents.
Published architectural design data may be included in:
Australian standards
international standards
Building Code of Australia
professional journals and manuscripts.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.
Overview of assessment
This unit of competency could be assessed on its own or as part of an integrated assessment activity involving other competencies relevant to the job function.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of:
recognising the needs and desires of people with disabilities to engage fully in all aspects of society, and their right to do so
interpreting accurately the impacts of the full range of disabilities and the limitations that each disability places on the individual's ability to access the environment
interpreting accurately how the full range of environmental barriers impact on any of the impairments that people with disabilities might have
measuring anatomical features and recording ergonomic data accurately in preparation for analysis
analysing ergonomic data using appropriate statistical methodologies
conducting comparative analysis between ergonomic data derived from defined populations and published architectural design data
identifying accurately ergonomic features that impact on the ability of a person with disabilities to work and function independently
applying organisational management policies and procedures, including quality assurance requirements.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Resource implications for assessment include:
a registered provider of assessment services
competency standards
assessment materials and tools
suitable assessment venue/equipment
workplace documentation
candidate special requirements
cost and time considerations.
Validity and sufficiency of evidence requires that:
competency will need to be demonstrated over a period of time reflecting the scope of the role
where the assessment is part of a structured learning experience the evidence collected must relate to a number of performances assessed at different points in time and separated by further learning and practice with a decision of competence only taken at the point when the assessor has complete confidence in the person's competence
all assessment that is part of a structured learning experience must include a combination of direct, indirect and supplementary evidence
where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (RCC/RPL), the evidence provided will need to be current and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time
assessment can be through simulated project-based activity and must include evidence relating to each of the elements in this unit.
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AXF68 CPPACC5006 Apply ergonomic principles to accessible building design and fitout Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
W980 CPP50711 Diploma of Access Consulting Qualification
BGI5 CPP60421 Advanced Diploma of Building Design Qualification
D772 CPP50911 Diploma of Building Design Qualification