Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 7:56 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Confirm transition strategy

Confirm transition strategy

Unit of competency
National Code
ICAA5055B
State Code
D0014
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
08/07/2010
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/11/2007
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
29/11/2007
Nominal Hours
10
Description
This unit defines the competency required to confirm the transition strategy produced in the light of additional knowledge of the system design and evolution of a change management plan.The following unit is linked to forms an appropriate cluster:ICAT5083B Develop and conduct client acceptance testNo licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Confirm delivery and acceptance plan
  • 1.1. Confirm phased delivery with the client and project team
  • 1.2. Confirm method of acceptance, acceptance criteria and that acceptance test plan is in place and agreed
2. Confirm data take up plan
  • 2.1. Identify the data source for each database
  • 2.2. Analyse possible integrity constraints
  • 2.3. Design the data conversion workflow, taking into consideration data validation, data clean-up and data loading
  • 2.4. Identify interface requirements, data take-up method, complexity and effort required
  • 2.5. Develop required data conversion contingencies and confirm with appropriate person
3. Confirm cutover plan
  • 3.1. Agree on the conversion window in operational timescale with appropriate person
  • 3.2. Plan and confirm parallel running with appropriate person
  • 3.3. Confirm approval of dependencies with appropriate person
  • 3.4. Confirm approval of fall-back options with appropriate person
  • 3.5. Confirm approval of checkpoints, tests and responsibilities with appropriate person
  • 3.6. Confirm approval of resources, tasks and timescales with appropriate person
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Client may include but is not limited to:
internal departments
external organisations
individual people
employees
Project team - teams may include:
solution developers and business clients working together
individual business analysts
a number of third-party solution developers working together
a number of different businesses working in partnership
Acceptance criteria may include:
timeframe
cost implications
technical
logistical considerations
Database may include but is not limited to:
relational databases
object-relational databases
proprietary databases and commercial off the shelf (COTS) database packages
Constraints may include but is not limited to:
time
budget
resource
hardware
software
policy
legal constraints
Requirements may be in reference to:
business
system
application
network
people in the organisation
Appropriate person may include:
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm sufficient knowledge of interpreting software specifications.
Assessment must confirm the ability to refine the transition strategy in the light of further technical information and change management plans.

To demonstrate competency in this unit the learner will require access to:
IT specifications
Change management plan
Acceptance test plan
IT security assurance specifications
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.

Assessment must ensure:
self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.

Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.

Competency in this unit should to be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.

Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICAT5083B Develop and conduct client acceptance test

An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas
Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements
Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations
Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters
Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
C8654 ICAA5055A Confirm transition strategy Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
D7887 ICAICT504A Confirm transition strategy for a new system Unit of competency
No information