Elements and Performance Criteria

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.
Research and consultation may:
Take place at the following levels:
international
national
state
regional
local community
Be:
qualitative
quantitative
Include the following processes:
interviews (e.g. structured, semi-structured and unstructured in group or individual settings)
conversation (e.g. telephone or face to face)
collection of materials (e.g. printed matter or videos)
attendance at workshops, meetings or forums
questionnaires and other survey techniques
Strategies to stimulate informed debate may include:
employing networking processes
using information and awareness raising techniques such as meetings, media releases, brochures, newsletters, community-based print and electronic media
using consultative processes
Lobbying may take place within various forums including:
workshops
meetings
conferences
seminars
public events
private discussions
committees
Policy frameworks are constructs of philosophy, protocols and processes designed to guide future action, and may cover:
national, state or territory and local government policies related to:
funding policies and criteria of resource-providing agencies
policies and practices of private support agencies
established procedures and practices of community groups
policy and guidelines for involving community participation
guidelines for initiating new program development
procedures for identifying, documenting and disseminating information
policies on records' maintenance and minimum requirements for records' security
procedures to be followed in resource identification, acquisition and disposal
practices and protocols to be followed for:
guidelines for conducting community safety audits
approval protocols for intrastate, interstate and international travel and for expense reimbursements
employment and unemployment
health
family
welfare
justice administration
equal opportunity
anti-discrimination
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
multicultural affairs
victims' support groups
women's groups
workplace relations
occupational health and safety (OHS)
youth
drugs
community safety
initiating and responding to requests for information and grievance issues or complaints
initiating and accessing professional development
Opportunities for improving and strengthening crime prevention service delivery include:
the nature and focus of services, programs and activities
organisational and community structures, policies, procedures and priorities
evaluations
work practices
level of personnel competence
community relationships and expectations
resource levels and use
cultural appropriateness of existing programs
levels and sources of funding
Innovative products and initiatives may include:
target-hardening strategies
fraud-control systems
alarm systems
technological advancements.
And may be promoted through a variety of means and forums including:
professional networks
conferences
public events
marketing material
Strategic communication initiatives may:
be developed by the practitioner
be developed by the practitioner's organisation
involve utilising a professional advertising or marketing service
Diverse communication methods may include:
use of media outlets
specific promotional campaigns and materials such as flyers, brochures, promotional articles in local newspapers
public communication, including:
use of existing own or other organisational information channels such as noticeboards, bulletin boards, newsletters and pamphlets
verbal briefings
memos
formal presentations
email newsgroups
public speaking opportunities
local media interviews and press releases
Potential resistance and negative publicity or perceptions may be because of:
previous experiences
misinformation
misunderstanding
Advantages and mutual benefits may include:
wider application of crime prevention strategies and practices
integration of initiatives
use of funds in high priority areas
publicising outcomes
Influential decision-making forums may be at local, state or national levels and may include:
consultative committees
working parties
steering groups and advisory groups
boards of control
reference groups

Overview of assessment requirements
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
Demonstrated ability to work constructively with individuals, organisations and processes to influence the future direction of crime prevention practice. In particular, evidence must be obtained on the ability to:
develop and promote policy positions
advance a crime prevention philosophy through strategic communication initiatives
influence organisations and processes to integrate crime prevention practices into operational activities.
Context of assessment
Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria applicable to the workplace environment, within the scope of the Range Statement.
Assessment must take account of the endorsed Assessment Guidelines in the relevant Training Package.
Evidence is best gathered through a holistic assessment activity that integrates the elements of competency.
Assessment should reinforce the integration of the key competencies as indicated at the end of this unit.
Formative assessments may be conducted off the job and/or in simulated work environments. However, summative assessment of this unit of competency must be undertaken in an actual setting and preferably in conjunction with normal crime prevention activities.
Evidence may be gathered by direct questioning, observation of consultation and liaison in context or by supervisor reports, and by examination of a portfolio. The portfolio should contain reports that show evidence of activities undertaken to develop policy positions, promote innovation and change and advance crime prevention principles and practices.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate his/her handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completing workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence of competency in this unit will need to be gathered over time and across arrange of actual or simulated workplace situations involving a combination of direct and indirect forms of supplementary evidence.
Substantiation of prior performance may be sought from supervisors and peers within the workplace or from others who are able to provide reliable and substantiated evidence regarding the candidate's prior performance.
Resource implications
This unit involves workplace-based activity. The resources should relate specifically to the organisation or community's policies, guidelines, requirements, resources and equipment and may include:
literature and information
organisational policies and guidelines
access to a particular geographic area and/or community group