Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 1:43 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Evaluate project submissions

Evaluate project submissions

Unit of competency
National Code
AHCCCF501A
State Code
D6782
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
10/06/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
06/07/2012
Field of Education
080315 - Project Management
Original Release Date
06/07/2012
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit covers evaluating project submission and defines the standard required to: develop an evaluation approach based on the original application; prepare appropriate forms, interview sheets and questionnaires; organise data collection on project inputs, processes, and outcomes according to the evaluation report; prepare reports including quantitative, qualitative and graphical data and analysis.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Review previously planned project outcomes
  • 1.1. Proposed project outcomes and evaluation approaches are identified from original approved application and any updates.
  • 1.2. Consultations are conducted with community group leaders, coordinators and facilitators as required to identify any changes to original plan, timelines, outcomes, and to evaluation.
  • 1.3. Timing and evaluation in terms of project progress are determined to identify availability of data and suitable range of evaluation methods.
2. Develop evaluation approach
  • 2.1. Evaluation approach is developed to include resources used and processes applied within the available data collection opportunities.
  • 2.2. Evaluation approach is developed around prior project evaluations, and program and agency requirements.
  • 2.3. Proposed evaluation approach is discussed with stakeholders to obtain comments and consent.
  • 2.4. Proposed evaluation approach is modified to cater for stakeholder views without compromising program and agency requirements and the evaluation results.
  • 2.5. Approval is obtained for evaluation approach and timing according to program and agency requirements.
3. Organise data collection
  • 3.1. Data is collected on project inputs, processes and outcomes according to evaluation approach.
  • 3.2. Appropriate instructions are provided to others for them to collect data on behalf of the evaluator.
  • 3.3. Appropriate forms and questionnaires are designed to implement the evaluation.
  • 3.4. Interviews are conducted and observations made according to the planned evaluation approach.
  • 3.5. Data is recorded in format suitable for analysis and reporting.
  • 3.6. Accuracy of data is checked according to evaluation practice and program and agency requirements.
4. Analyse data
  • 4.1. Data is analysed according to the evaluation plan to obtain required information on inputs, processes and outputs.
  • 4.2. Data is analysed progressively during evaluation to identify any deficiencies.
  • 4.3. Any deficiencies in data are rectified where possible by changes in evaluation and data collection methods.
  • 4.4. Appropriate software is used for quantitative analysis.
  • 4.5. Analysis is recorded to program and agency requirements.
5. Report on and implement conclusions
  • 5.1. Report is prepared to program, agency and project requirements.
  • 5.2. Analysis and report conclusions are checked with key stakeholders to identify any deficiencies to be removed or additional information that should be included.
  • 5.3. Report meets required program and agency standards in terms of layout, format, style and process.
  • 5.4. Data collection, analysis and reporting are timely to project agency requirements.
  • 5.5. Report is submitted according to project, program and agency requirements.
  • 5.6. Report on conclusions is implemented to project, program and agency requirements and within the scope of the group resources and authority.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole.
Project submissions may include:
submissions for funding for community-based Landcare programs or similar at regional and State/Territory levels.
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit must be relevant to workplace operations and satisfy holistically all of the requirements of the performance criteria and required skills and knowledge and include achievement of the following:
develop an evaluation approach based on the original application
prepare appropriate forms, interview sheets and questionnaires
organise data collection on project inputs, processes, and outcomes according to the evaluation report
prepare reports including quantitative, qualitative and graphical data and analysis.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Competency requires the application of work practices under work conditions. Selection and use of resources for some worksites may differ due to the regional or enterprise circumstances.
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
S2688 RTD5509A Evaluate project submissions Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
BAM95 AHCCCF501 Evaluate project submissions Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
D524 AHC51210 Diploma of Community Coordination and Facilitation Qualification
AWX2 DEF54315 Diploma of Evaluations Qualification