Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 9:40 PM AWST
22/07/2026 9:40 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Investigate and plan to optimise the operation of chemical addition processes
Investigate and plan to optimise the operation of chemical addition processes
Unit of competency
National Code
NWP409A
NWP409A
State Code
D4821
D4821
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
02/06/2011
Field of Education
030907 - Water And Sanitary Engineering
Original Release Date
02/06/2011
Nominal Hours
60
Description
This unit of competency describes the outcomes required to review, coordinate and optimise chemical addition processes and to evaluate and report on system performance and process quality control.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Evaluate coagulation and flocculation process performance.
- 1.1 Review existing process performance data against relevant organisational and legislative requirements.
- 1.2 Identify the impact of changing raw water quality on chemical addition processes as required.
- 1.3 Identify and coordinate any additional sampling and testing required for valid evaluation of current process performance.
2 Investigate chemical addition plant configuration.
- 2.1 Review existing fault reports and other relevant plant asset information.
- 2.2 Investigate the operational status of plant components with reference to manufacturers' and plant designers' specifications.
- 2.3 Carry out plant configuration investigations to identify potential deficiencies.
3 Investigate chemical options for process optimisation.
- 3.1 Review current chemical addition practices with reference to organisational procedures to identify potential deficiencies.
- 3.2 Investigate dosing options for current chemicals.
- 3.3 Identify and investigate new or additional chemicals and related dosing options.
4 Develop and record a plan for process optimisation.
- 4.1 Determine plant configuration or chemical options for process optimisation.
- 4.2 Plan a trial to test the performance of the determined optimisation options.
- 4.3 Compile report with recommendations on optimisation options.
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Organisational or legislative requirements may include:
organisational performance quality standards
standard operating procedures
quality assurance guidelines
federal, state and local environmental and water quality legislation
occupational health and safety requirements
water quality standards and guidelines
Changing raw water quality may include:
pH
turbidity
colour
presence of algae
temperature
Testing may include:
jar testing
flocculation growth
mixing energy
UV absorbance
pH
colour
turbidity
residual aluminium or iron
quality of treatment chemicals
Plant components may include:
mixing equipment
streaming current detector
dosing pumps
chemical injection equipment
turbidity meter
particle counter
Manufacturers' and plant designers' specifications may include:
dosing pump capacity and calibration charts
detention times
mixing intensity for flash or rapid mixing and flocculation
Plant configuration may include:
location of chemical dosing points
mixing or reaction detention times
type of mixer or impeller
Chemicals may include:
Polyaluminium chloride (PACL)
aluminium sulphate
aluminium chlorohydrate (ACH)
ferric chloride
ferric sulphate
polyDADMAC
polyacrylamide
sulphuric acid
hydrated lime
caustic soda
Organisational or legislative requirements may include:
organisational performance quality standards
standard operating procedures
quality assurance guidelines
federal, state and local environmental and water quality legislation
occupational health and safety requirements
water quality standards and guidelines
Changing raw water quality may include:
pH
turbidity
colour
presence of algae
temperature
Testing may include:
jar testing
flocculation growth
mixing energy
UV absorbance
pH
colour
turbidity
residual aluminium or iron
quality of treatment chemicals
Plant components may include:
mixing equipment
streaming current detector
dosing pumps
chemical injection equipment
turbidity meter
particle counter
Manufacturers' and plant designers' specifications may include:
dosing pump capacity and calibration charts
detention times
mixing intensity for flash or rapid mixing and flocculation
Plant configuration may include:
location of chemical dosing points
mixing or reaction detention times
type of mixer or impeller
Chemicals may include:
Polyaluminium chloride (PACL)
aluminium sulphate
aluminium chlorohydrate (ACH)
ferric chloride
ferric sulphate
polyDADMAC
polyacrylamide
sulphuric acid
hydrated lime
caustic soda
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The candidate should demonstrate the ability to review, coordinate and optimise chemical addition processes including:
reviewing existing process performance with reference to historical data, differences in raw water quality and plant configuration
identifying data deficiencies and organising additional data collection through appropriate sampling and testing
assessing fault reports and investigating the current operational status of plant components
investigating current and potential chemical addition practices
planning trials to test the performance of the determined optimisation options and compiling reports making recommendations
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Access to the workplace and resources, including:
documentation that should normally be available in a water industry organisation
relevant codes, standards and government regulations
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and assessment support when required.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Validity and sufficiency of evidence requires that:
competency will need to be demonstrated over a period of time reflecting the scope of the role and the practical requirements of the workplace
where the assessment is part of a structured learning experience the evidence collected must relate to a number of performances assessed at different points in time and separated by further learning and practice
a decision of competence only taken at the point when the assessor has complete confidence in the person's competence over time and in various contexts
all assessment that is part of a structured learning experience must include a combination of direct, indirect and supplementary evidence
where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (RCC/RPL), the evidence provided will need to be authenticated and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time
assessment can be through simulated project-based activity and must include evidence relating to each of the elements in this unit
Questioning will be appropriate to the skill levels of the operator and cultural issues that may affect responses to the questions, and will reflect the requirements of the competency and the work being performed.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
The candidate should demonstrate the ability to review, coordinate and optimise chemical addition processes including:
reviewing existing process performance with reference to historical data, differences in raw water quality and plant configuration
identifying data deficiencies and organising additional data collection through appropriate sampling and testing
assessing fault reports and investigating the current operational status of plant components
investigating current and potential chemical addition practices
planning trials to test the performance of the determined optimisation options and compiling reports making recommendations
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Access to the workplace and resources, including:
documentation that should normally be available in a water industry organisation
relevant codes, standards and government regulations
Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and assessment support when required.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Validity and sufficiency of evidence requires that:
competency will need to be demonstrated over a period of time reflecting the scope of the role and the practical requirements of the workplace
where the assessment is part of a structured learning experience the evidence collected must relate to a number of performances assessed at different points in time and separated by further learning and practice
a decision of competence only taken at the point when the assessor has complete confidence in the person's competence over time and in various contexts
all assessment that is part of a structured learning experience must include a combination of direct, indirect and supplementary evidence
where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (RCC/RPL), the evidence provided will need to be authenticated and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time
assessment can be through simulated project-based activity and must include evidence relating to each of the elements in this unit
Questioning will be appropriate to the skill levels of the operator and cultural issues that may affect responses to the questions, and will reflect the requirements of the competency and the work being performed.
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVY24 | NWPTRT011 | Assess and improve chemical dosing process | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D246 | NWP40107 | Certificate IV in Water Operations | Qualification |