Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
24/07/2026 7:19 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Manage assessment and validation of IT solutions

Manage assessment and validation of IT solutions

Unit of competency
National Code
ICASAD607A
State Code
D8119
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
18/07/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
26/03/2012
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
26/03/2012
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to determine the best IT solution and facilitate its implementation.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Assess proposed solution
  • 1.1 Rank solution options on business value and advantages and disadvantages of alternatives
  • 1.2 Generate and consider solution options and additional capabilities
2. Allocate requirements
  • 2.1 Allocate requirements to solution components to maximise business value
  • 2.2 Facilitate allocation of requirements to a specific project release, phase or iteration
3. Assess organisational readiness
  • 3.1 Conduct cultural assessment
  • 3.2 Conduct operational or technical assessment
  • 3.3 Perform stakeholder impact analysis
4. Define transition requirements
  • 4.1 Evaluate old system actual data and metadata
  • 4.2 Develop options for managing ongoing work during transition to the new solution
  • 4.3 Participate in organisational change-management recommendations or processes as required
5. Validate solution
  • 5.1 Investigate defective solution outputs
  • 5.2 Assess defects and issues
6. Evaluate solution performance
  • 6.1 Realise value delivered by the solution
  • 6.2 Validate solution metrics
  • 6.3 Decide solution replacement or elimination
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Solution components may include:
business policies and business rules
business processes to be performed and managed
people who operate and maintain the solution, including their job functions and responsibilities
software applications and application components used in the solution
structure of the organisation, including interactions between the organisation and its customers and suppliers.
Stakeholder impact analysis may include:
changed costs
different interface
new workflow.
Defective solution outputs may include:
inappropriate output
incorrect output
irrelevant output.
Solution replacement or elimination may include:
adjustment of solution
necessity
ongoing cost versus initial investment
opportunity cost of pursuing alternative courses of action
removal of solution from option list
replacement of solution
sunk cost - the money and effort already committed to an initiative.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
categorise benefits and disadvantages of various solution options
assess cultural impact of different solutions
compare transition requirements between solutions
analyse output variances between solutions
remove inappropriate solutions from list
recommend remaining solutions in priority order.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
documentation, including appropriate policies, current business analysis practices, tools and legislation
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
evaluation of a simulated or workplace project in a medium to large enterprise
direct observation of the candidate carrying out business analysis work
verbal or written questioning to assess required knowledge and skills
review of reports and plans prepared for the projects
evaluation of a portfolio of the project work undertaken.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AUW14 ICTSAD607 Manage assessment and validation of ICT solutions Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
D578 ICA60311 Advanced Diploma of Information Technology Business Analysis Qualification