Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 3:07 PM AWST
22/07/2026 3:07 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Implement employee performance management systems
Implement employee performance management systems
Unit of competency
National Code
LGAGOVA612B
LGAGOVA612B
State Code
C1929
C1929
TGA Status
Deleted
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Deleted
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
20/01/2006
Field of Education
080303 - Human Resource Management
Original Release Date
20/01/2006
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit covers developing and managing performance management systems. The unit is appropriate for human resources personnel and senior managers responsible for the development of performance management systems in the organisation.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Develop performance management system
- 1.1 Council strategic and operational plans are analysed and objectives and expectations are defined to inform the development of a performance management system.
- 1.2 Performance objectives, key performance indicators and performance standards are developed in consultation with stakeholders.
- 1.3 Systems are developed to ensure performance is monitored and feedback is provided throughout the period of performance.
- 1.4 Systems are responsive to changing developments, both internal and external to the council.
2 Implement performance management system
- 2.1 Support for the performance management system is obtained.
- 2.2 Relevant groups and individuals are trained to monitor performance and identify performance gaps.
- 2.3 System is launched through appropriate communication channels.
- 2.4 Feedback is obtained to ensure that the system is understood and accepted.
- 2.5 Performance is monitored regularly and intervention occurs to recognise both substandard and excellent performance.
- 2.6 Processes are established to deal with problems and grievances that arise from the performance feedback.
3 Monitor and review performance management system
- 3.1 Employees, unions and management are consulted to ascertain effectiveness of system.
- 3.2 Measures of system effectiveness are monitored against expectations.
- 3.3 A revision plan is developed and implemented to improve the system in keeping with council objectives and policy.
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.
Performance management system may include:
processes to determine individual employee performance targets or goals
processes to ensure there is a shared understanding of what employees will be assessed against
managing individuals in a way that increases the probability that goals will be achieved in both the longer and shorter term, in accordance with industrial agreements
Key performance indicators may include:
those measures developed to gauge performance against targets
Performance standards may include:
the quantitative or qualitative level of performance desired of employees
Stakeholders may include:
managers
employees
unions
elected members
consultants
joint consultative committees
Relevant groups and individuals may include:
all those who have a role in the implementation of policies, procedures or decisions and/or are affected by their implementation
Performance management system may include:
processes to determine individual employee performance targets or goals
processes to ensure there is a shared understanding of what employees will be assessed against
managing individuals in a way that increases the probability that goals will be achieved in both the longer and shorter term, in accordance with industrial agreements
Key performance indicators may include:
those measures developed to gauge performance against targets
Performance standards may include:
the quantitative or qualitative level of performance desired of employees
Stakeholders may include:
managers
employees
unions
elected members
consultants
joint consultative committees
Relevant groups and individuals may include:
all those who have a role in the implementation of policies, procedures or decisions and/or are affected by their implementation
Overview of assessment requirements
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
The demonstrated ability to:
develop a performance management system to meet the needs of council
implement a performance management system
monitor the effectiveness of the system and implement changes to improve the system.
Context of assessment
Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria, with particular attention to the critical aspects and the knowledge and skills elaborated in the Evidence Guide, and within the scope of the Range Statement.
Assessment must take account of the endorsed Assessment Guidelines in the Local Government Training Package.
Assessment of performance requirements in this unit should be undertaken in an actual workplace or simulated environment.
Assessment should reinforce the integration of the key competencies for the particular AQF level. Refer to the key competency levels at the end of this unit.
Relationship to other units(prerequisite or co-requisite units)
To enable holistic assessment this unit may be assessed with other units that form part of the job role.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor.
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence should be collected over a set period of time that is sufficient to include dealings with an appropriate range and variety of situations.
Resource implications
The learner and trainer should have access to appropriate documentation and resources normally used in the workplace.
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
The demonstrated ability to:
develop a performance management system to meet the needs of council
implement a performance management system
monitor the effectiveness of the system and implement changes to improve the system.
Context of assessment
Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria, with particular attention to the critical aspects and the knowledge and skills elaborated in the Evidence Guide, and within the scope of the Range Statement.
Assessment must take account of the endorsed Assessment Guidelines in the Local Government Training Package.
Assessment of performance requirements in this unit should be undertaken in an actual workplace or simulated environment.
Assessment should reinforce the integration of the key competencies for the particular AQF level. Refer to the key competency levels at the end of this unit.
Relationship to other units(prerequisite or co-requisite units)
To enable holistic assessment this unit may be assessed with other units that form part of the job role.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor.
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence should be collected over a set period of time that is sufficient to include dealings with an appropriate range and variety of situations.
Resource implications
The learner and trainer should have access to appropriate documentation and resources normally used in the workplace.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4336 | LGAGOVA612A | Implement employee performance management systems | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C745 | LGA50104 | Diploma of Local Government Administration | Qualification |