Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 8:42 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Resolve valuation and property services disputes

Resolve valuation and property services disputes

Unit of competency
National Code
LGAGOVA618A
State Code
C4340
TGA Status
Deleted
DTWD Status
Deleted
Current Release Number
2.00
Current Release Date
11/09/2012
View on TGA
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
18/05/2004
Field of Education
089903 - Valuation
Original Release Date
18/05/2004
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit covers the review of property rating services, through objection or enquiry, and necessary legal processes.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Receive and acknowledge enquiry or objection
  • 1.1 Enquiries or objections are assessed to establish if the matter is within the jurisdiction of the valuation area, or are referred as appropriate.
  • 1.2 Information is assessed to establish need for compliance with legislative requirements.
  • 1.3 Time required to service the enquiry or objection is established to identify if an immediate response will satisfy requirements.
  • 1.4 Written acknowledgement is prepared where required to meet council and legislative requirements.
2 Review submission and advise of enquiry decision
  • 2.1 Submissions are thoroughly assessed for error and omission.
  • 2.2 Formal discussions are held with objector as required by relevant legislation.
  • 2.3 A full property inspection is undertaken, where appropriate in the presence of an objector, and in accordance with council procedures.
  • 2.4 The valuation or classification is reviewed after consideration of any new or additional information.
  • 2.5 Decisions are advised to relevant parties in accordance with legislative and council requirements.
3 Attend formal conference as required
  • 3.1 Conference presentation is prepared that outlines the methods and data utilised to determine valuation.
  • 3.2 The objector's submission is received and acknowledged so that the basis of objection is clearly understood.
  • 3.3 A decision is made to amend the valuation or reject the objection.
  • 3.4 A notice of decision is prepared and forwarded to relevant parties in accordance with council and legislative requirements.
4 Undertake legal action to resolve dispute
  • 4.1 An accurate solicitor's brief is prepared, supported by detailed evidence.
  • 4.2 A clear report to council is prepared that recommends appropriate action.
  • 4.3 Procedures are initiated as required through council's solicitors.
  • 4.4 Council is represented at legal briefings and hearings through presentation of a detailed submission that protects council's interests.
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.
Formal conference may include:
valuation review panel
independent valuation
Legal action may include:
land and valuation court
supreme court
Overview of assessment requirements
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
Confirmation of property details.
External reinspection of property.
Re-examination of sale or rental figures.
Reassessment of the application of property value.
Context of assessment
On the job or in a simulated work environment.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence will need to be gathered over time across a range of variables.
Resource implications
Access to a workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:
copies of relevant legislation
council procedures relating to dispute resolution
real or mock processes, including submissions
property inspections
formal conference proceedings
court hearings
No information