Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
23/07/2026 2:47 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Recommend a refractory for an application

Recommend a refractory for an application

Unit of competency
National Code
MSATCM503A
State Code
W9058
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
07/04/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
11/08/2009
Field of Education
030305 - Materials Engineering
Original Release Date
11/08/2009
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit covers the knowledge and skills needed to recommend a refractory for an application based on a knowledge of the properties, application and modes of failure of the principal refractories.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Identify the process requirements for a refractory
  • 1.1. Identify the pH of the metallurgical slags
  • 1.2. Determine the insulating requirements from the refractory
  • 1.3. Determine other process requirements from the refractory
  • 1.4. Identify likely process causes of refractory failure
  • 1.5. Specify refractory needs in terms of physical and chemical properties required.
  • 1.6.
2. Recommend type of refractory material
  • 2.1. Select a refractory class suitable for the pH of the metallurgical slag
  • 2.2. Shortlist refractory materials within that class suitable for the insulting and other process demands
  • 2.3. Contrast the principal modes of failure for each short listed refractory with the likely process causes of refractory failure
  • 2.4. Recommend suitable refractory material/s for the job.
  • 2.5.
3. Consider economic and technical implications of different modes of installation
  • 3.1. . Compare possible alternative refractory materials
  • 3.2. Compare possible alternative installation methods
  • 3.3. Consider alternative materials with different installation methods and their overall technical/economic performance
  • 3.4. Recommend a refractory material and a method of installation which delivers the best economic and technical performance for the application.
  • 3.5.
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Principal refractories
Principal refractories includes:
silica
alumino silicates
dolomite
magnesite-chrome,
chrome-magnesite
chrome
insulation and insulating refractories
special refractories (eg graphite, silicon carbide)
monolithic refractories ie cement, plastics, ramming mixes and castables
pH

pH of slags to be identified as acidic, basic or neutral in regards to their interaction with refractories.
Modes of installation
Modes of installation include:
monolithic
fired shape structures
bricks
other (eg sprayed)
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.

Overview of assessment
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to recommend a refractory for application. Critical aspects for assessment and evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit.
The person will be able to select appropriate materials and installation methodologies for specified situations. Assessment may be by workplace project, case study or suitable alternative. The selection should be able to be justified on technical and economic grounds.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
It is essential that competence is demonstrated in the ability to:
identify refractory requirements for particular metals, alloys, slags and processes
recommend refractories that are appropriate from both a technical and economic perspective
determine the mode of refractory failure and recommend a more appropriate solution
Relationship to other units
This unit may be assessed concurrently with other relevant units.
Assessment method and context
Assessment will need to occur in an organisation using refractory materials.
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the elements, performance criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of
If evidence is provided from a complete reline, or an initial refractory lining, then one recommendation may provide sufficient evidence. Where evidence is from the ongoing maintenance of an existing refractory, then it will be needed from a range of activities to provide sufficient evidence.
Resource implications
This section should be read in conjunction with the range of variables for this unit of competency. Resources required include suitable access to an organisation using refractories that allows for appropriate and realistic simulation. A bank of case studies/scenarios and questions will also be required to the extent that they form part of the assessment method. Questioning may take place either in the workplace, or in an adjacent, quiet facility such as an office or lunchroom. No other special resources are required.
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
OEW43 MEM48014 Recommend a refractory for an application Unit of competency
State Code National Code Title Type
W528 MSA60108 Advanced Diploma of Manufacturing Technology Qualification
W526 MSA50108 Diploma of Manufacturing Technology Qualification