Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 9:03 AM AWST
22/07/2026 9:03 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Scope implementation requirements
Scope implementation requirements
Unit of competency
National Code
ICAI5086B
ICAI5086B
State Code
D0114
D0114
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/11/2007
Field of Education
031305 - Computer Engineering
Original Release Date
29/11/2007
Nominal Hours
15
Description
This unit defines the competency required to define boundaries and deliverables of a system installation project in the context of an overall implementation plan.The unit relates to implementation at one location although may involve building wide implementation. It is not intended that this unit include implementation of multiple sites across cities, states or countries.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Confirm scope with parties
- 1.1. Review project plan and other documentation to determine installation requirements and other implementation issues
- 1.2. Develop and document preliminary projectscope and submit to appropriateperson
- 1.3. Review requests for revision to scope
- 1.4. Identify areas for further development
- 1.5. Prepare implementation plan and forward to appropriateperson
2. Update plans to account for scope
- 2.1. Review implementation plan, taking into account the scope of the system
- 2.2. Review key dates and events to determine if conflicts exist
- 2.3. Confirm revised plans and documents with appropriateperson for final approval and sign-off
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
parties and their responsibilities
project scope
project objectives
schedule
project budget
Milestones and timeline
Project objectives
Project constraints
Financials
Resources required
Roles of involved parties
Equipment and software to be installed
Description of outcomes (deliverables)
Customer acceptance criteria
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
parties and their responsibilities
project scope
project objectives
schedule
project budget
Milestones and timeline
Project objectives
Project constraints
Financials
Resources required
Roles of involved parties
Equipment and software to be installed
Description of outcomes (deliverables)
Customer acceptance criteria
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm the ability to identify and convey a clear understanding of project deliverables, boundaries and roles across all involved parties.
Part of the assessment must determine the ability to consider, plan and document an implementation approach, having regard to implementation drivers, measures of success, implementation by functional area and coordination.
To demonstrate competency in this unit the person will require access to:
Project plan
Client expectations brief
Required hardware software and the related specifications
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.
Assessment must ensure:
The demonstration of competency may also require self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.
Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.
Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.
Assessment of this unit of competency should include a review of documents developed by an organisation that relate to implementation approach, implementation drivers, measures of success, implementation by functional area and implementation coordination.
Supplementary questioning may be used during the summative assessment phase, where necessary, to ensure that all issues relating to the scope of the implementation have been considered and appropriate choices made given the implementation approach and measures of success.
Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended.
An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas
Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements
Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations
Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters
Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm the ability to identify and convey a clear understanding of project deliverables, boundaries and roles across all involved parties.
Part of the assessment must determine the ability to consider, plan and document an implementation approach, having regard to implementation drivers, measures of success, implementation by functional area and coordination.
To demonstrate competency in this unit the person will require access to:
Project plan
Client expectations brief
Required hardware software and the related specifications
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity covering planning and initiation of alternative approaches to skills or knowledge applications across a broad range of technical and/or management requirements, evaluation and coordination would be characteristic.
Assessment must ensure:
The demonstration of competency may also require self-directed application of knowledge and skills, with substantial depth in some areas where judgement is required in planning and selecting appropriate equipment, services and techniques for self and others.
Applications involve participation in development of strategic initiatives as well as personal responsibility and autonomy in performing complex technical operations or organising others. It may include participation in teams including teams concerned with planning and evaluation functions. Group or team coordination may also be involved.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.
Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.
Assessment of this unit of competency should include a review of documents developed by an organisation that relate to implementation approach, implementation drivers, measures of success, implementation by functional area and implementation coordination.
Supplementary questioning may be used during the summative assessment phase, where necessary, to ensure that all issues relating to the scope of the implementation have been considered and appropriate choices made given the implementation approach and measures of success.
Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended.
An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating theoretical concepts, with substantial depth in some areas
Analyse and plan approaches to technical problems or management requirements
Transfer and apply theoretical concepts and/or technical or creative skills to a range of situations
Evaluate information, using it to forecast for planning or research purposes
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to broad quantity and quality parameters
Take some responsibility for the achievement of group outcomes
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C8754 | ICAI5086A | Scope implementation requirements | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D8084 | ICASAS422A | Scope implementation requirements | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C874 | ICA50805 | Diploma of Information Technology (Systems Analysis and Design) | Qualification |