Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 7:45 AM AWST
22/07/2026 7:45 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Evaluate system status
Evaluate system status
Unit of competency
National Code
ICAS4109B
ICAS4109B
State Code
D0199
D0199
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/11/2007
Field of Education
029999 - Information Technology, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
29/11/2007
Nominal Hours
20
Description
This unit defines the competency required to evaluate the status of a running system, covering both hardware and software aspects to determine system performance and reliability.The following units are linked and form an appropriate cluster:ICAS4107B Rectify system faults on a live systemICAS4112B Optimise system performanceICAS4127B Support system softwareNo licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Determine scope and evaluation parameters
- 1.1. Determine scope of the system evaluation
- 1.2. Comply with organisational requirements when planning a 'change of status' test
- 1.3. Review and demonstrate understanding of the reason for the evaluation, its objectives, deliverables and key performance indicators using appropriate capacity tools
- 1.4. Plan and document status evaluation and factor in time, environment, internal and external issues
- 1.5. Alert affected users if evaluation is likely to impact their operations
- 1.6. Develop a plan for the evaluation and identify the resources and methods to be used
2. Carry out evaluation
- 2.1. Organise the required resources as outlined in the plan, and put in place manual or computerised evaluation methods
- 2.2. Run the evaluation process in accordance with the agreed scope and evaluation parameters
- 2.3. Record the status as per procedural parameters and plan
- 2.4. Observe and document during evaluation the effects of changes to system status that are made in accordance with effect being evaluated
- 2.5. Observe and record effects that are not listed and that may require further investigation
3. Report on evaluation
- 3.1. Prepare a report to the appropriate person indicating the results of the status check
- 3.2. Highlight anomalies observed in the status check that are outside the expected results
- 3.3. Make recommendations for changes to improve the system
RANGE STATEMENT
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Scope may include:
personnel
hardware
software
warranty
maintenance
support
networks
data
processes
Organisational requirements may be in relation to:
work environment
problem solution processes
preventative maintenance and diagnostic policy
roles and technical responsibilities in the IT department
vendor and product service-level support agreements
Documentation may follow:
ISO/IEC/AS standards
audit trails
naming standards
version control
project management templates and report writing
maintaining equipment inventory
client training
satisfaction reports
Appropriate person may include:
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
System may include but is not limited to:
network
network operating system
software
application
software
business
computers
financial system
management system
information system
User may include:
a person within a department
a department within the organisation
a third party
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Scope may include:
personnel
hardware
software
warranty
maintenance
support
networks
data
processes
Organisational requirements may be in relation to:
work environment
problem solution processes
preventative maintenance and diagnostic policy
roles and technical responsibilities in the IT department
vendor and product service-level support agreements
Documentation may follow:
ISO/IEC/AS standards
audit trails
naming standards
version control
project management templates and report writing
maintaining equipment inventory
client training
satisfaction reports
Appropriate person may include:
supervisor
teacher
authorised business representative
client
System may include but is not limited to:
network
network operating system
software
application
software
business
computers
financial system
management system
information system
User may include:
a person within a department
a department within the organisation
a third party
EVIDENCE GUIDE
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm the ability to identify comprehensive performance indicators to determine system performance and reliability in relation to both hardware and software.
To demonstrate competency in this unit the learner will require access to:
Documentation standards
Back-up and recovery policies
Database package with data
Server and networked PC on which to conduct back-up and recovery procedures
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity of knowledge and skills in this competency would cover a broad range of varied activities or application in a wider variety of contexts most of which are complex and non-routine. Leadership and guidance would be involved when organising activities of self and others as well as contributing to technical solutions of a non-routine or contingency nature.
Assessment must ensure:
Performance of a broad range of skilled applications including the requirement to evaluate and analyse current practices, develop new criteria and procedures for performing current practices and provision of some leadership and guidance to others in the application and planning of the skills would be characteristic.
Applications may involve responsibility for, and limited organisation of, others.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.
Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.
Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICAS4107B Rectify system faults on a live system
ICAS4112B Optimise system performance
ICAS4127B Support system software
An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating some theoretical concepts
Apply solutions to a defined range of unpredictable problems
Identify and apply skill and knowledge areas to a wide variety of contexts, with depth in some areas
Identify, analyse and evaluate information from a variety of sources
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to specified quality standards
Take limited responsibility for the quantity and quality of the output of others
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the following is essential:
Assessment must confirm the ability to identify comprehensive performance indicators to determine system performance and reliability in relation to both hardware and software.
To demonstrate competency in this unit the learner will require access to:
Documentation standards
Back-up and recovery policies
Database package with data
Server and networked PC on which to conduct back-up and recovery procedures
Context of and specific resources for assessment
The breadth, depth and complexity of knowledge and skills in this competency would cover a broad range of varied activities or application in a wider variety of contexts most of which are complex and non-routine. Leadership and guidance would be involved when organising activities of self and others as well as contributing to technical solutions of a non-routine or contingency nature.
Assessment must ensure:
Performance of a broad range of skilled applications including the requirement to evaluate and analyse current practices, develop new criteria and procedures for performing current practices and provision of some leadership and guidance to others in the application and planning of the skills would be characteristic.
Applications may involve responsibility for, and limited organisation of, others.
Method of assessment
The purpose of this unit is to define the standard of performance to be achieved in the workplace. In undertaking training and assessment activities related to this unit, consideration should be given to the implementation of appropriate diversity and accessibility practices in order to accommodate people who may have special needs. Additional guidance on these and related matters is provided in ICA05 Section 1.
Competency in this unit should be assessed using summative assessment to ensure consistency of performance in a range of contexts. This unit can be assessed either in the workplace or in a simulated environment. However, simulated activities must closely reflect the workplace to enable full demonstration of competency.
Assessment will usually include observation of real or simulated work processes and procedures and/or performance in a project context as well as questioning on underpinning knowledge and skills. The questioning of team members, supervisors, subordinates, peers and clients where appropriate may provide valuable input to the assessment process. The interdependence of units for assessment purposes may vary with the particular project or scenario.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, for example:
ICAS4107B Rectify system faults on a live system
ICAS4112B Optimise system performance
ICAS4127B Support system software
An individual demonstrating this competency would be able to:
Demonstrate understanding of a broad knowledge base incorporating some theoretical concepts
Apply solutions to a defined range of unpredictable problems
Identify and apply skill and knowledge areas to a wide variety of contexts, with depth in some areas
Identify, analyse and evaluate information from a variety of sources
Take responsibility for own outputs in relation to specified quality standards
Take limited responsibility for the quantity and quality of the output of others
Maintain knowledge of industry products and services
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C8800 | ICAS4109A | Evaluate system status | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D8076 | ICASAS414A | Evaluate system status | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D197 | CUF40307 | Certificate IV in Broadcast Technology | Qualification |
| C865 | ICA40705 | Certificate IV in Information Technology (Systems Analysis and Design) | Qualification |
| C864 | ICA40605 | Certificate IV in Information Technology (Testing) | Qualification |