Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 8:52 AM AWST
22/07/2026 8:52 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Evaluate system status
Evaluate system status
Unit of competency
National Code
ICASAS414A
ICASAS414A
State Code
D8076
D8076
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/09/2011
Field of Education
029999 - Information Technology, N.e.c.
Original Release Date
29/09/2011
Nominal Hours
20
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to evaluate the status of a running system, covering both hardware and software aspects to determine system performance and reliability.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Determine scope and evaluation parameters
- 1.1 Determine scope of the system evaluation
- 1.2 Comply with organisational requirements when planning a ‘change of status’ test
- 1.3 Review the reason for the evaluation, its objectives, deliverables and key performance indicators, using appropriate capacity tools
- 1.4 Plan and document status evaluation and factor in time, environment, internal and external issues
- 1.5 Alert affected users if evaluation is likely to impact their operations
- 1.6 Develop a plan for the evaluation and identify the resources and methods to be used
2. Carry out evaluation
- 2.1 Organise the required resources as outlined in the plan, and put in place manual or computerised evaluation methods
- 2.2 Run the evaluation process according to the agreed scope and evaluation parameters
- 2.3 Record the status as per procedural parameters and plan
- 2.4 Observe and document during evaluation the effects of changes to system status that are made according to effect being evaluated
- 2.5 Observe and record effects that are not listed and that may require further investigation
3. Report on evaluation
- 3.1 Prepare a report to the appropriate person indicating the results of the status check in the documentation
- 3.2 Highlight anomalies observed in the status check that are outside the expected results
- 3.3 Make recommendations for changes to improve the system
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Scope may include:
data
hardware
maintenance
networks
personnel
processes
software
support
warranty.
System may include:
application
business
computers
financial system
information system
management system
network
network operating system
software.
Organisational requirements may include:
preventative maintenance and diagnostic policy
problem-solution processes
roles and technical responsibilities in the IT department
vendor and product service level agreements (SLAs)
work environment.
Users may include:
department within the organisation
person within a department
third party.
Appropriate person may include:
authorised business representative
client
project manager
supervisor.
Documentation may include:
audit trails
client training
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and Australian Standards (AS) standards
maintaining equipment inventory
naming standards
project-management templates and report writing
satisfaction reports
version control.
Scope may include:
data
hardware
maintenance
networks
personnel
processes
software
support
warranty.
System may include:
application
business
computers
financial system
information system
management system
network
network operating system
software.
Organisational requirements may include:
preventative maintenance and diagnostic policy
problem-solution processes
roles and technical responsibilities in the IT department
vendor and product service level agreements (SLAs)
work environment.
Users may include:
department within the organisation
person within a department
third party.
Appropriate person may include:
authorised business representative
client
project manager
supervisor.
Documentation may include:
audit trails
client training
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and Australian Standards (AS) standards
maintaining equipment inventory
naming standards
project-management templates and report writing
satisfaction reports
version control.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
test a system
identify comprehensive performance indicators to determine system performance and reliability related to both hardware and software
document the results.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
documentation standards
backup and recovery policies
database package with data
server and networked personal computer on which to conduct backup and recovery procedure
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct observation of candidate:
undertaking evaluation of system status
determining the system performance and reliability
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of:
current functionality of the system
implications of success and failure of proposed modifications and the required steps or procedures
review of candidate’s documentation of results of system test.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
test a system
identify comprehensive performance indicators to determine system performance and reliability related to both hardware and software
document the results.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
documentation standards
backup and recovery policies
database package with data
server and networked personal computer on which to conduct backup and recovery procedure
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
direct observation of candidate:
undertaking evaluation of system status
determining the system performance and reliability
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of:
current functionality of the system
implications of success and failure of proposed modifications and the required steps or procedures
review of candidate’s documentation of results of system test.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D0199 | ICAS4109B | Evaluate system status | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUW38 | ICTSAS414 | Evaluate system status | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D557 | ICA40111 | Certificate IV in Information Technology | Qualification |
| D558 | ICA40211 | Certificate IV in Information Technology Support | Qualification |
| D563 | ICA40711 | Certificate IV in Systems Analysis and Design | Qualification |