Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 5:51 AM AWST
22/07/2026 5:51 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Protect heritage and cultural assets
Protect heritage and cultural assets
Unit of competency
National Code
LGAPLEM612B
LGAPLEM612B
State Code
C3701
C3701
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
01/11/2012
Field of Education
080301 - Business Management
Original Release Date
01/11/2012
Nominal Hours
40
Description
This unit covers establishing an inventory, assessing opportunities and threats and developing strategies for heritage and cultural assets.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Prepare inventory of heritage and cultural assets
- 1.1 Heritage and cultural assets within the community, and council expectations and requirements relating to them, are identified.
- 1.2 The significance of each heritage and cultural asset is assessed according to established criteria and community expectations.
- 1.3 An adequate information base of significant places is obtained through comprehensive field investigation and research.
- 1.4 Data is collected accurately and objectively on heritage and cultural assets.
- 1.5 A comprehensive inventory of heritage and cultural assets is prepared with full and detailed descriptions of history and significance.
2 Assess threats and opportunities for the protection of heritage and cultural assets
- 2.1 Threats and opportunities are identified to ensure all factors are fully assessed.
- 2.2 Based on input from council and the community, criteria are established to enable threats and opportunities to be prioritised.
3 Identify and develop strategies for the protection of heritage and cultural assets
- 3.1 Criteria are established to identify priorities.
- 3.2 Consultation with the community and property owners is undertaken to seek views on the conservation action required to protect the significant attributes of the area.
- 3.3 A framework for the legal protection of heritage and cultural assets is established through existing legislation.
- 3.4 Practical and appropriate strategies to conserve heritage and cultural assets are determined.
- 3.5 The effectiveness of strategies is assessed through a comparison with methods used elsewhere.
- 3.6 The policy elements of the proposed heritage program are determined.
- 3.7 Innovative approaches are developed to protect heritage and cultural assets in response to the local community need.
4 Implement strategies for the protection of heritage and cultural assets
- 4.1 The study and program are adopted by the local authority.
- 4.2 Consultation is undertaken with the community and property owners about the study and proposed heritage program.
- 4.3 Financial resources are identified and procured within budget cycles to support the achievement of required outcomes.
- 4.4 Personnel are identified, trained and assigned to tasks so that requirements for skills and knowledge are met.
- 4.5 Physical facilities and equipment are identified and procured within budget cycles to support the achievement of required outcomes.
- 4.6 Community education and information materials are prepared and distributed to ensure ongoing support for the strategy.
- 4.7 The strategy is incorporated into council policies and procedures and relevant legislation.
- 4.8 A timetable for implementation is established and priorities are set.
5 Monitor and review the effectiveness of strategies to protect heritage and cultural assets
- 5.1 Further research is undertaken on places listed as being of local significance in the study.
- 5.2 Additional plans of significance are identified and reviewed.
- 5.3 An annual heritage report is prepared if required.
- 5.4 Information received from monitoring and review is used to develop new strategies that are based on accumulated knowledge and experience.
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.
Heritage may include:
cultural and environmental issues
national and local area significance
danger component of heritage element or structure
Significance may be:
aesthetic, historical, scientific and social aspects
community expectations.
national
state
regional
local
contributory
Data includes:
survey information
historical research
existing reports
studies and texts
Information may include:
written and oral records
reports
instructions
directions from supervisor and management
formal and informal interviews
team meetings
reports from other services, agencies, specialists and experts
media
Threats may include:
political emphasis
reductions in maintenance
lack of planning
other authorities' planning
competing interests
community attitudes
Criteria may include:
community preferences
budget constraints
legislative provisions
resources
time frames
age
outstanding craftsmanship
architectural style
construction technology
an association with important events or figures
building type
rarity
technical or creative achievement
representing a way of life
artistic
religious or cultural associations
Places of significance may include:
buildings
structures
plantings
subsurface remains
Heritage may include:
cultural and environmental issues
national and local area significance
danger component of heritage element or structure
Significance may be:
aesthetic, historical, scientific and social aspects
community expectations.
national
state
regional
local
contributory
Data includes:
survey information
historical research
existing reports
studies and texts
Information may include:
written and oral records
reports
instructions
directions from supervisor and management
formal and informal interviews
team meetings
reports from other services, agencies, specialists and experts
media
Threats may include:
political emphasis
reductions in maintenance
lack of planning
other authorities' planning
competing interests
community attitudes
Criteria may include:
community preferences
budget constraints
legislative provisions
resources
time frames
age
outstanding craftsmanship
architectural style
construction technology
an association with important events or figures
building type
rarity
technical or creative achievement
representing a way of life
artistic
religious or cultural associations
Places of significance may include:
buildings
structures
plantings
subsurface remains
Overview of assessment requirements
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
The demonstrated ability to:
identify and protect heritage and cultural assets
identify and implement strategies to protect heritage and cultural assets
put in place monitoring processes
Context of assessment
Assessment of performance requirements in this unit should be undertaken within the context of the local government framework. Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria, including the Range of Variables applicable to the workplace environment.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence should be gathered over a period of time in a range of actual or simulated management environments.
Resource implications
Access to a workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:
relevant data such as survey information
historical research
existing reports
studies and texts
financial and budget information
real or simulated consultation process
copies of relevant regulations, standards and policies
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated.
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered
The demonstrated ability to:
identify and protect heritage and cultural assets
identify and implement strategies to protect heritage and cultural assets
put in place monitoring processes
Context of assessment
Assessment of performance requirements in this unit should be undertaken within the context of the local government framework. Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria, including the Range of Variables applicable to the workplace environment.
Method of assessment
The following assessment methods are suggested:
observation of the learner performing a range of workplace tasks over sufficient time to demonstrate handling of a range of contingencies
written and/or oral questioning to assess knowledge and understanding
completion of workplace documentation
third-party reports from experienced practitioners
completion of self-paced learning materials including personal reflection and feedback from trainer, coach or supervisor
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance
Evidence should be gathered over a period of time in a range of actual or simulated management environments.
Resource implications
Access to a workplace or simulated case study that provides the following resources:
relevant data such as survey information
historical research
existing reports
studies and texts
financial and budget information
real or simulated consultation process
copies of relevant regulations, standards and policies
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| C4361 | LGAPLEM612A | Protect heritage and cultural assets | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODA13 | LGAPLA005 | Protect heritage and cultural assets | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BDC4 | AHC60516 | Advanced Diploma of Arboriculture | Qualification |
| BFG6 | AHC60520 | Advanced Diploma of Arboriculture | Qualification |
| BGF9 | AHC51120 | Diploma of Conservation and Ecosystem Management | Qualification |
| BDA6 | AHC51116 | Diploma of Conservation and Land Management | Qualification |
| BAL4 | FWP50116 | Diploma of Forest and Forest Products | Qualification |
| J478 | FPI50111 | Diploma of Forest and Forest Products | Qualification |
| J264 | LGA50712 | Diploma of Local Government | Qualification |
| C759 | LGA50304 | Diploma of Local Government (Land Management) | Qualification |