Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
24/07/2026 1:46 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Analyse process changes

Analyse process changes

Unit of competency
National Code
MSS407003A
State Code
WD581
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
02/05/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
29/08/2014
Field of Education
080307 - Organisation Management
Original Release Date
29/08/2014
Nominal Hours
70
Description
This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required to quantitatively analyse past changes made in an organisation’s the operations, systems, process or environment to ensure the quantum of expected change has been achieved and that gains are maintained and are used as a basis for further gains. The unit includes statistical and other mathematical analysis of data, methods for capturing data on implemented changes (quantitative and qualitative) and producing useful information from this data. It includes consultation with stakeholders both for data validation and consensus decision-making for future improvements.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Analyse a change
  • 1.1 Identify changes which have occurred
  • 1.2 Select a change or group of related changes to analyse
  • 1.3 Determine the initiation of the selected change
  • 1.4 Identify relevant metrics and predicted values for these metrics
  • 1.5 Gather data for these metrics prior to the change
  • 1.6 Gather data and information on the implementation of the change
  • 1.7 Gather data for these metrics after the change
  • 1.8 Survey all key metrics and identify any where variations may correlate with the change being analysed
  • 1.9 Discuss results of change with key stakeholders and identify other possible (qualitative or quantitative) results of the change
  • 1.10 Analyse this data to determine the results of the change
2 Review results of change with stakeholders
  • 2.1 Identify trends over time in all relevant metrics
  • 2.2 Analyse correlated metrics to determine causal relationship
  • 2.3 Audit health, safety and environment (HSE) impacts as a result of the change
  • 2.4 Present information in a form understandable by stakeholders
  • 2.5 Discuss analysed information with relevant stakeholders
  • 2.6 Modify information based on stakeholder input, as required
  • 2.7 Develop a consensus view of the result of the change which is supported by the information available
  • 2.8 Validate the consensus view with stakeholders
3 Identify future improvements
  • 3.1 Discuss lessons learned from the change with stakeholders
  • 3.2 Capture key knowledge in accordance with systems and procedures
  • 3.3 Identify future improvements in collaboration with team members
  • 3.4 Validate identified changes with stakeholders
  • 3.5 Obtain sign off from process/system owner
  • 3.6 Start the process for implementing future improvements
  • 3.7 Check that the planned improvements are occurring
  • 3.8 Take action to sustain improvement by standardising
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Competitive systems and practices

Competitive systems and practices may include, but are not limited to:
lean operations
agile operations
preventative and predictive maintenance approaches
monitoring and data gathering systems, such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Materials Resource Planning (MRP) and proprietary systems
statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma
Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull-related operations control systems
supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis
5S
continuous improvement (kaizen)
breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)
cause/effect diagrams
overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
takt time
process mapping
problem solving
run charts
standard procedures
current reality tree
Competitive systems and practices should be interpreted so as to take into account:
the stage of implementation of competitive systems and practices
the size of the enterprise
the work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and the industry sector
Codes of practice/standards
Where changes include areas covered by industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, the latest version must be used
Gather prior data
Where all suitable data was not collected prior to the change a suitable proxy for the data will be needed
HSE
All changes implemented are expected to be at least neutral, or preferably beneficial, in their impact on HSE
Change
Changes may:
be to plant, operations, products, procedures or practice
arise from continuous improvement (or an improvement event/project) or implementing new products, technology or systems
may have been intended to make an improvement or to implement new products, technology or systems
include the implementation of a change
Changes do not include an engineering review of a major capital expenditure or similar review
Initiation of change
Changes need to be identified as either deliberately or not deliberately initiated. Where a change was not deliberately initiated then the causal factors for the change need to be identified
Correlated metrics
Correlated metrics include:
any metric which appears to show a chronological correlation with the change being analysed. These metrics need to be examined to determine if the change has a causal relationship or is simply coincidental
Presentation of information
Information may be presented:
in appropriate visual forms (e.g. graphs, charts and noticeboards
verbally or other forms able to be understood and used by stakeholders
Stakeholders
Stakeholders may include:
work team members
value stream members
managers
Results of change
The change results may include:
an initial improvement followed by a return to previous performance
continued improvement
continued detriment or other variations over time
Improvements
Improvements may:
be to operations, process, plant, procedures or practice
include changes to ensure positive benefits are maintained
Sustaining improvement
Improvement may be sustained by including it in:
standard procedures and work instructions
standard practice
other relevant documents and practices
Team leader
Team leader may include:
any person who may have either a permanent or an ad hoc role in facilitating the function of a team in a workplace
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of the ability to:
analyse process changes
identify changes
gather data and information over a period and range that will provide a valid basis for analysis
select and use appropriate data analysis tools
present information in a suitable form
obtain a consensus view of the results of the change
determine the lessons to be learned and future improvements to be undertaken.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment of performance must be undertaken in a workplace using or implementing one or more competitive systems and practices.
Access may be required to:
workplace procedures and plans relevant to work area
specifications and documentation relating to planned, currently being implemented, or implemented changes to work processes and procedures relevant to the assessee
documentation and information in relation to production, waste, overheads and hazard control/management
reports from supervisors/managers
case studies and scenarios to assess responses to contingencies.
Method of assessment
A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Competence in this unit may be assessed by using a combination of the following to generate evidence:
demonstration in the workplace
workplace projects
suitable simulation
case studies/scenarios (particularly for assessment of contingencies, improvement scenarios, and so on)
targeted questioning
reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues (third-party reports)
portfolio of evidence.
In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess underpinning knowledge.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
BAJ70 MSS407003 Analyse process changes Unit of competency