Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 7:11 AM AWST
22/07/2026 7:11 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Identify and evaluate IT industry vendor technologies
Identify and evaluate IT industry vendor technologies
Unit of competency
National Code
ICASAS405A
ICASAS405A
State Code
D8067
D8067
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
04/11/2011
Field of Education
020305 - Systems Analysis And Design
Original Release Date
04/11/2011
Nominal Hours
15
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to research, evaluate and recommend an industry vendor to supply IT components and to negotiate with the vendor for supply of identified components.This unit of competency provides for several approaches, with an emphasis on researching and analysing alternative options in dealing with vendors when acquiring IT components. It covers testing, comparisons and evaluations based on the abovementioned elements, as well as consideration of such other factors as after-sales service and reliability.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Select method to be used for identifying suitable vendor
- 1.1 Evaluate organisational purchasing policy as a means of identifying vendors and document outcomes
- 1.2 Consider and undertake other means of identifying suitable vendors and document outcomes
- 1.3 Recommend preferred method of vendor selection to client
- 1.4 Plan and document selection process
2. Review vendor offerings
- 2.1 Notify vendors of organisation's requirements
- 2.2 Undertake evaluation process by comparing offers against organisational requirements
- 2.3 Organise vendor demonstrations and performance benchmark tests
- 2.4 Select vendor based on specific technical criteria, servicing, warranty and after-sales service
3. Prepare contracts and delivery requirements
- 3.1 Prepare contracts for review by appropriate person
- 3.2 Identify and document delivery arrangements with suppliers
- 3.3 Clarify installation responsibilities with suppliers
- 3.4 Review warranty and support requirements with suppliers and service level agreement
- 3.5 Confirm details with client
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Method of vendor selection may include:
by tender or invitation
registration of interest
request for information (RFI)
request for proposal (RFP).
Client may include:
external organisations
individuals
internal departments
internal employees.
Appropriate person may include:
authorised business representative
client
supervisor.
Method of vendor selection may include:
by tender or invitation
registration of interest
request for information (RFI)
request for proposal (RFP).
Client may include:
external organisations
individuals
internal departments
internal employees.
Appropriate person may include:
authorised business representative
client
supervisor.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
identify an appropriate vendor to supply components according to organisational requirements
demonstrate consistency in the acquisition of technical and business requirements.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
current business and IT strategic plans
service levels
user requirements
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of:
organisational purchasing policy
tenders
service level agreements
review of candidate’s documented selection process
direct observation of candidate obtaining requirements from user.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
identify an appropriate vendor to supply components according to organisational requirements
demonstrate consistency in the acquisition of technical and business requirements.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment must ensure access to:
current business and IT strategic plans
service levels
user requirements
appropriate learning and assessment support when required
modified equipment for people with special needs.
Method of assessment
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate for this unit:
verbal or written questioning to assess candidate’s knowledge of:
organisational purchasing policy
tenders
service level agreements
review of candidate’s documented selection process
direct observation of candidate obtaining requirements from user.
Guidance information for assessment
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended, where appropriate.
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate, and suitable to the communication skill level, language, literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Indigenous people and other people from a non-English speaking background may need additional support.
In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D0116 | ICAI5088B | Evaluate and negotiate vendor offerings | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUW39 | ICTSAS405 | Identify and evaluate ICT industry vendor technologies | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D557 | ICA40111 | Certificate IV in Information Technology | Qualification |