Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 10:28 PM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Lead engineering-related quality operations in an enterprise

Lead engineering-related quality operations in an enterprise

Unit of competency
National Code
MEM234033A
State Code
S8128
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
21/12/2011
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
28/05/2012
Field of Education
080317 - Quality Management
Original Release Date
28/05/2012
Nominal Hours
36
Description
This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required to provide a technical leadership role in the coordination of quality operations in an enterprise on an ongoing or project basis.It includes knowledge of relevant regulations, interpreting internal or external client brief, liaison with designers and other professional and technical specialists, and ensuring that organisation members are aware of technical and performance requirements.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Set strategy for integration of quality operations with organisation, project goals and business plans
  • 1.1 Prepare or review organisation formal policy documents and establish implications for quality operations
  • 1.2 Establish senior management expectations and objectives for quality department and communicate as appropriate
  • 1.3 Identify role of quality department in organisation, project or business plan including capability reporting, budgeting, and contribution to marketing and sales strategy and communicate to organisation, team as appropriate
2 Set key performance output variables
  • 2.1 Liaise with sales and marketing staff to identify external customer profiles and requirements
  • 2.2 Review internal customer specifications
  • 2.3 Set and manage required key performance output variables
  • 2.4 Recommend any required changes to key performance output variables
3 Set key performance input variables
  • 3.1 Analyse drawings, specifications, procedures and regulatory requirements for project, product or process
  • 3.2 Set parameters for any capability studies of process or procedures, where appropriate
  • 3.3 Analyse data from capability studies of process or procedures, as required, and take appropriate action
  • 3.4 Identify key equipment, technologies procedures used and set performance input variables
  • 3.5 Identify current maintenance strategies, where appropriate
  • 3.6 Identify risks, vulnerabilities and critical control points
  • 3.7 Recommend any required changes to maintenance strategies in order to maintain quality performance
4 Implement quality operations
  • 4.1 Communicate key performance input and output variables to team, where appropriate
  • 4.2 Ensure key performance input and output variables are communicated to appropriate departments, including purchasing, logistics and dealer liaison, or directly along the value stream
  • 4.3 Allocate quality-related responsibilities to quality team
  • 4.4 Identify or set budget and other resources required for quality operation
  • 4.5 Establish reporting processes for quality team operations
  • 4.6 Establish and monitor data collection procedures, including integration with process control
  • 4.7 Identify and eliminate root causes of defective processes or procedures in participation with the processing departments and quality team
  • 4.8 Provide advice on work environments to enable employees to be responsible for quality of their own work
  • 4.9 Establish regular employee feedback on quality operations
5 Evaluate present, past performance and undertake risk assessment
  • 5.1 Ensure timely and effective communication from customer liaison of complaints, warranty claims and returns, where appropriate
  • 5.2 Analyse data for non-conformances to key performance input and output variables and establish root causes and recommend actions to be taken in conjunction with quality team
  • 5.3 Analyse risks to quality from supplier or distributor failure
  • 5.4 Identify performance levels required to maintain regulatory and commercial contractual compliance
  • 5.5 Communicate data throughout the organisation to assist in future improvements
6 Establish procedures for engineering-related quality non-conformances
  • 6.1 Establish reporting procedures for quality non-conformances within the project, process or procedure across the organisation
  • 6.2 Establish short-term contingency procedures to cover non-conformances
  • 6.3 Allocate responsibilities to determine root cause and recommendations for corrective action, as appropriate
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Organisation formal policy documents
Organisation formal policy documents are those that have Board and/or senior management approval and include:
vision statements
organisation goals
annual reports
business plans
regulatory reports
Quality team
For this unit the term quality team means all employees, and in some cases suppliers and customers, who have a role in ensuring the quality of products and processes meet specifications. The quality team may be:
a formally designated team consisting of employees allocated full or part time to a quality role or a group of employees who have quality responsibilities as part of their normal job role
Coordination of the quality role
Coordination of the quality role includes:
aligning enterprise outputs products or services with customer requirements
identifying defective processes or procedure
establishing the engineering related key process input/output variables
establishing action plans and putting control systems in place
Coordination may also include:
contributing to current or new product, process or procedure design
External customer profiles and requirements
External customer profiles and requirements may include:
analysis of customer surveys
existing profiles
past orders
other communication and documentation
Internal customer specifications
Internal customer specifications may include:
employee surveys
operating procedures
drawings
other documentation/records
Maintenance strategies
Maintenance strategies include:
TPM
RCM
failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
proactive maintenance
breakdown or corrective maintenance
Areas of responsibilities for quality team members
Responsibilities for quality team members may be allocated on a departmental or functional basis. Examples of functional responsibilities include:
statistical data collection and analysis
non-conformances
managing quality performance of new products or processes
customer liaison, including surveys, warranty claim analysis and returns
contributing to design processes to ensure quality objectives are taken into account
Examples of functional quality responsibilities include:
production
maintenance
support services, including engineering-related quality logistics, administration and purchasing
Engineering-related quality advice on work environment
Engineering-related quality advice on work environments includes advice on:
skills development needed to enable employees to achieve quality targets
workstation design, including jigs and fixtures
equipment operation and machine and tool setting specifications
plant layout
inspection procedures
standardisation of processes
Employee feedback
Employee feedback may include:
toolbox meetings, quality circles
suggestion schemes
regular meetings between quality team, supervisors and employees
production and error reports
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Assessors must be satisfied that the candidate can competently and consistently:
identify, plan and establish key quality input and output variables, and requirements for the project, procedure or operation
establish resources required, including labour, materials, and equipment within budgets and procedures
commence project or operation management, including establishing, where required, support team and responsibilities
overcome constraints to achievement of the quality objectives
undertake appropriate internal and external reporting
investigate and validate quality performance analysis, and manage continuous improvement
undertake customer liaison, including surveys, warranty claim analysis and returns.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
This unit may be assessed on the job, or a combination of both on and off the job. Where assessment occurs off the job, that is, the candidate is not in productive work, then a simulated working environment must be used where the range of conditions reflects realistic workplace situations. The competencies covered by this unit would be demonstrated by an individual working alone or as part of a team.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities.
Method of assessment
Assessment must satisfy the endorsed Assessment Guidelines of the MEM05 Metal and Engineering Training Package.
Assessment methods must confirm consistency and accuracy of performance (over time and in a range of workplace relevant contexts) together with application of underpinning knowledge.
Assessment methods must be by direct observation of tasks and include questioning on underpinning knowledge to ensure its correct interpretation and application.
Assessment may be applied under project-related conditions (real or simulated) and require evidence of process.
Assessment must confirm a reasonable inference that competency is able not only to be satisfied under the particular circumstance, but is able to be transferred to other circumstances.
Assessment may be in conjunction with assessment of other units of competency where required.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
OEV47 MEM234033 Lead engineering-related quality operations in an organisation Unit of competency
No information