Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
23/07/2026 5:45 AM AWST
23/07/2026 5:45 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Undertake value analysis of product or process costs in terms of customer requirements
Undertake value analysis of product or process costs in terms of customer requirements
Unit of competency
National Code
MSS405031A
MSS405031A
State Code
WD563
WD563
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
24/10/2014
Field of Education
080317 - Quality Management
Original Release Date
24/10/2014
Nominal Hours
60
Description
This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required by an employee who is required to analyse products and processes to determine the value-adding factors, including design and processing costs that most impact on meeting customer requirements and which may also include competitor benchmarking. The unit also includes implementing identified changes that increase cost-efficiency. The unit may be applied individually or in a team environment.In this unit an employee uses an analysis of the benefits/features which a customer perceives to be in a product or service as a basis for determining appropriate or unnecessary cost and so identifying and reducing waste.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Analyse customer benefits to determine appropriate or waste costs
- 1.1 Analyse product or service to determine features/benefits perceived by customer in product
- 1.2 Analyse cost components of product or service and determine those which deliver customer features/benefits and those which are either appropriate or waste
- 1.3 Determine any additional features that may be added to improve saleability
- 1.4 Analyse waste cost components and allocate to direct and indirect cost categories
- 1.5 Determine options for reducing direct and indirect waste costs
- 1.6 Select cost-related actions which maximise customer benefits and minimise costs
- 1.7 Where required, undertake competitor benchmarking to provide reference points
2 Analyse performance variance
- 2.1 Identify waste processing or operational steps for product or service following completion of customer benefit analysis
- 2.2 Analyse all costs and determine methods of reducing costs/waste
- 2.3 Develop plan and recommendations for actions required to achieve cost improvement or added customer benefits to improve saleability
- 2.4 Submit plan and recommendations to stakeholders
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Competitive systems and practices
Competitive systems and practices may include, but are not limited to:
lean operations
agile operations
preventative and predictive maintenance approaches
monitoring and data gathering systems, such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Materials Resource Planning (MRP) and proprietary systems
statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma
Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull-related operations control systems
supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis
5S
continuous improvement (kaizen)
breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)
cause/effect diagrams
overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
takt time
process mapping
problem solving
run charts
standard procedures
current reality tree
Competitive systems and practices should be interpreted so as to take into account:
the stage of implementation of competitive systems and practices
the size of the enterprise
the work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and the industry sector
Waste
Waste (also known as muda in the Toyota Production System and its derivatives) is any activity which does not contribute to customer benefit/features in the product.
Within operations, categories of waste include:
excess production and early production
delays
movement and transport
poor process design
inventory
inefficient performance of a process
making defective items
activities which do not yield any benefit to the organisation or any benefit to the organisations customers
Cost
Cost includes:
the monetary value of expenditures able to be directly identified for supplies, services, direct labour, components, cost of inventory, faults and reworks, rejects/scrap, equipment and other items used in the production of the product
allocations and estimates for indirect costs (e.g. indirect labour, rent, power and water) where a direct monetary value cannot be identified
Determine customer feature/benefits
This unit does not require that customer features/benefits must be obtained by the person undertaking the unit directly contacting customers. The features/benefits may have already been determined by sales and marketing personnel and passed on to operations. However, the unit requires that the product or process must be analysed to determine how the product or process supplies the features/benefits and by which step/feature of the product or process
Performance
Performance is may be thought of as the rate of output or delivery of the performance or service compared to the rate required to meet demand for the product or service
Cycle time
Cycle time includes:
the normal time to complete an operation on a product
Pull
Pull is the concept of producing to demand, rather than for stock or some forecast
Competitive systems and practices
Competitive systems and practices may include, but are not limited to:
lean operations
agile operations
preventative and predictive maintenance approaches
monitoring and data gathering systems, such as Systems Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) software, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Materials Resource Planning (MRP) and proprietary systems
statistical process control systems, including six sigma and three sigma
Just in Time (JIT), kanban and other pull-related operations control systems
supply, value, and demand chain monitoring and analysis
5S
continuous improvement (kaizen)
breakthrough improvement (kaizen blitz)
cause/effect diagrams
overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
takt time
process mapping
problem solving
run charts
standard procedures
current reality tree
Competitive systems and practices should be interpreted so as to take into account:
the stage of implementation of competitive systems and practices
the size of the enterprise
the work organisation, culture, regulatory environment and the industry sector
Waste
Waste (also known as muda in the Toyota Production System and its derivatives) is any activity which does not contribute to customer benefit/features in the product.
Within operations, categories of waste include:
excess production and early production
delays
movement and transport
poor process design
inventory
inefficient performance of a process
making defective items
activities which do not yield any benefit to the organisation or any benefit to the organisations customers
Cost
Cost includes:
the monetary value of expenditures able to be directly identified for supplies, services, direct labour, components, cost of inventory, faults and reworks, rejects/scrap, equipment and other items used in the production of the product
allocations and estimates for indirect costs (e.g. indirect labour, rent, power and water) where a direct monetary value cannot be identified
Determine customer feature/benefits
This unit does not require that customer features/benefits must be obtained by the person undertaking the unit directly contacting customers. The features/benefits may have already been determined by sales and marketing personnel and passed on to operations. However, the unit requires that the product or process must be analysed to determine how the product or process supplies the features/benefits and by which step/feature of the product or process
Performance
Performance is may be thought of as the rate of output or delivery of the performance or service compared to the rate required to meet demand for the product or service
Cycle time
Cycle time includes:
the normal time to complete an operation on a product
Pull
Pull is the concept of producing to demand, rather than for stock or some forecast
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of their ability to:
identify customer features/benefits for a product and their impact on market share or saleability of the product
determine direct/indirect costs in a product
determine which costs are waste
analyse cycle times and make suggestions for reduction in cycle time
develop a cost/waste reduction plan.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment of performance must be undertaken in a workplace using or implementing one or more competitive systems and practices.
Access may be required to:
workplace procedures and plans relevant to work area
specifications and documentation relating to planned, currently being implemented. or implemented changes to work processes and procedures relevant to the assessee
documentation and information in relation to production, waste, overheads and hazard control/management
reports from supervisors/managers
case studies and scenarios to assess responses to contingencies.
Method of assessment
A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Competence in this unit may be assessed by using a combination of the following to generate evidence:
demonstration in the workplace
workplace projects
suitable simulation
case studies/scenarios (particularly for assessment of contingencies, improvement scenarios, and so on)
targeted questioning
reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues (third-party reports)
portfolio of evidence
In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess underpinning knowledge.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide evidence of their ability to:
identify customer features/benefits for a product and their impact on market share or saleability of the product
determine direct/indirect costs in a product
determine which costs are waste
analyse cycle times and make suggestions for reduction in cycle time
develop a cost/waste reduction plan.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Assessment of performance must be undertaken in a workplace using or implementing one or more competitive systems and practices.
Access may be required to:
workplace procedures and plans relevant to work area
specifications and documentation relating to planned, currently being implemented. or implemented changes to work processes and procedures relevant to the assessee
documentation and information in relation to production, waste, overheads and hazard control/management
reports from supervisors/managers
case studies and scenarios to assess responses to contingencies.
Method of assessment
A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Competence in this unit may be assessed by using a combination of the following to generate evidence:
demonstration in the workplace
workplace projects
suitable simulation
case studies/scenarios (particularly for assessment of contingencies, improvement scenarios, and so on)
targeted questioning
reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues (third-party reports)
portfolio of evidence
In all cases it is expected that practical assessment will be combined with targeted questioning to assess underpinning knowledge.
Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability.
Guidance information for assessment
Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| W9018 | MSACMT631A | Undertake value analysis of product costs in terms of customer requirements | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAJ88 | MSS405031 | Undertake value analysis of product or process costs in terms of customer requirements | Unit of competency |