Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 3:09 PM AWST
22/07/2026 3:09 PM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Assist in implementing a proactive maintenance strategy
Assist in implementing a proactive maintenance strategy
Unit of competency
National Code
MSACMT482A
MSACMT482A
State Code
W9011
W9011
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
30/06/2011
Field of Education
080317 - Quality Management
Original Release Date
30/06/2011
Nominal Hours
50
Description
This unit covers the knowledge and skills required by a maintenance person to assist in the implementation of a proactive maintenance strategy in a manufacturing environment. This unit includes the interaction between maintenance worker and operator as appropriate.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Develop components of reliability strategy for a work/plant area
- 1.1. Determine manufacturer's recommended inspection, servicing and related schedules for relevant plant 1.2. Consult with relevant people with regard to appropriate inspections, services and schedules1.3. Discuss any conflicts with relevant people and seek resolution of conflicts1.4. Develop schedules in liaison with relevant people1.5. Identify inspections and servicing which may be done by operations personnel in liaison with relevant stakeholders
2. Assess current practice for maintenance implications
- 2.1. Evaluate procedures for plant/equipment reliability implications 2.2. Discuss current practices with relevant people to determine any plant/equipment reliability implications2.3. Recommend changes to improve plant/equipment reliability in accordance with procedures
3. Assist in implementing the reliability strategy
- 3.1. Arrange for schedules to be incorporated in relevant work plans3.2. Identify training needs in discussion with relevant personnel3.3. Assist personnel to develop required skills for inspections/servicing within scope of authority3.4. Collect data/information as required by own work plan3.5. Compare data/information with performance indicators3.6. Recommend improvements to reliability strategy in accordance with procedures
Total Preventative Maintenance/Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is an application of total quality management to maintenance with the intention of increasing reliability, getting it right first time and increasing
Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM) moves maintenance from reactive, or even planned/programmed, towards a focus on
Some industry sectors have highly adapted forms of FMEA and may practice traditional FMEA in say their routine maintenance while using another technique (such as
Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE) is the combination of the main factors causing loss of productive capacity from equipment/plant and is:
where:
availability takes into account losses due to breakdown, set up and adjustments
performance takes into account losses due to minor stoppages, reduced speed and idling
quality rate takes into account the losses due to rejects, reworks and start up waste.
Uptime refers to the overall availability of the plant - it is the inverse of downtime - or the unavailability of the plant. Ideal uptime is 100%.
Inspection may include:
reading dials, gauges, meters
observations including those using sight, hearing, smell, feel
observations of product quality/faults/rejects.
Servicing may include:
cleaning
lubricating
topping up
adjusting.
Procedures include all work instructions, standard operating procedures, formulas/recipes, batch sheets, temporary instructions and similar instructions provided for the smooth running of the plant. They may be written, verbal, computer based or in some other form.
For the purposes of this Training Package, 'procedures' also includes good operating practice as may be defined by industry codes of practice (e.g. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), Responsible Care) and government regulations.
Overview of assessment requirements
There should be evidence that the maintenance person is routinely applying proactive maintenance strategies in their routine work and that they are aware of why they are important. In a TPM environment, the operator needs to move to taking ownership of their equipment/plant and maintenance personnel have a role to play in helping this happen and in developing the competence of operating personnel to do so
What critical aspects of evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of schedules developed and implemented and improvements recommended.
In what context should assessment occur?
This unit needs to be assessed in a workplace practising, or beginning to implement proactive maintenance.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit could be assessed in conjunction with a technical unit related to maintenance.
This unit is related to:
These units are complimentary and in some organisations it may be appropriate for the one person to hold both competencies.
This unit is related to:
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the elements, performance criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
There needs to be evidence that schedules related to proactive maintenance have been developed either in an initial implementation of a proactive maintenance strategy, or have been developed as part of continuous improvement to the proactive maintenance strategy.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a plant implementing/practising proactive maintenance. No other specific resources are required.
There should be evidence that the maintenance person is routinely applying proactive maintenance strategies in their routine work and that they are aware of why they are important. In a TPM environment, the operator needs to move to taking ownership of their equipment/plant and maintenance personnel have a role to play in helping this happen and in developing the competence of operating personnel to do so
What critical aspects of evidence are required to demonstrate competency in this unit?
Evidence of schedules developed and implemented and improvements recommended.
In what context should assessment occur?
This unit needs to be assessed in a workplace practising, or beginning to implement proactive maintenance.
Are there any other units which could or should be assessed with this unit or which relate directly to this unit?
This unit could be assessed in conjunction with a technical unit related to maintenance.
This unit is related to:
These units are complimentary and in some organisations it may be appropriate for the one person to hold both competencies.
This unit is related to:
What method of assessment should apply?
Assessors must be satisfied that the person can consistently perform the unit as a whole, as defined by the elements, performance criteria, skills and knowledge. A holistic approach should be taken to the assessment.
Assessors should gather sufficient, fair, valid, reliable, authentic and current evidence from a range of sources. Sources of evidence may include direct observation, reports from supervisors, peers and colleagues, project work, samples, organisation records and questioning. Assessment should not require language, literacy or numeracy skills beyond those required for the unit.
The assessee will have access to all techniques, procedures, information, resources and aids which would normally be available in the workplace.
The method of assessment should be discussed and agreed with the assessee prior to the commencement of the assessment.
What evidence is required for demonstration of consistent performance?
There needs to be evidence that schedules related to proactive maintenance have been developed either in an initial implementation of a proactive maintenance strategy, or have been developed as part of continuous improvement to the proactive maintenance strategy.
What are the specific resource requirements for this unit?
Access to a plant implementing/practising proactive maintenance. No other specific resources are required.
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| W2593 | MCMT482A | Assist in implementing a proactive maintenance strategy | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD543 | MSS404082A | Assist in implementing a proactive maintenance strategy | Unit of competency |
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| W517 | PMA40108 | Certificate IV in Process Plant Technology | Qualification |