Unit of competency Outline

Date retreived
22/07/2026 10:23 AM AWST

Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.

Conduct a sound assessment of a dispute in preparation for mediation

Conduct a sound assessment of a dispute in preparation for mediation

Unit of competency
National Code
CHCMED411B
State Code
WC936
TGA Status
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Current Release Number
1.00
Current Release Date
07/05/2012
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
17/07/2014
Field of Education
090513 - Counselling
Original Release Date
17/07/2014
Nominal Hours
45
Description
DescriptorThis unit describes the knowledge and skills required for mediators to prepare for the mediation process and to assist parties to be aware of their roles and responsibilities in mediation
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Provide information about the mediation process
  • 1.1 Provide accurate, timely and relevant information about the mediation processes available
  • 1.2 Identify co-mediation needs
  • 1.3 Clarify co-mediation roles and use according to agency guidelines
  • 1.4 Verify that all parties to the mediation understand the sequential steps of mediation
  • 1.5 Ensure parties are clear on own, mediator, and agency roles
  • 1.6 Ensure boundaries of confidentiality and privacy are clear to parties
2. Clarify information presented relating to the dispute
  • 2.1 Accurately and concisely analyse issues presented prior to the mediation to assess most suitable case management options
  • 2.2 Clarify the need to seek advice on legal or factual complexity of the matter
  • 2.3 Note court orders, identify potential risks and formulate responses using relevant knowledge of safety procedures
3. Assess readiness to participate
  • 3.1 Prepare and counsel parties in preparation for a mediation process
  • 3.2 Assess power differentials between parties
  • 3.3 Assess cultural perspectives that may affect the mediation process
  • 3.4 Use security and safety guidelines in accordance with legislative and industry procedures
  • 3.5 Ensure timely and effective exclusion of mediation is achieved where appropriate
  • 3.6 Provide accurate and effective referral of parties as required to others within or external to the agency
4. Clarify commitment to the process
  • 4.1 Clarify emotions and expectations of parties in order to estimate their capacity to commit
  • 4.2 Consider parties' capacity to negotiate
  • 4.3 Determine parties' readiness to consider and commit to the mediation processes
  • 4.4 Consider adequacy of intake procedures
5. Prepare venue and resources for mediation
  • 5.1 Analyse needs of parties and prepare venue accordingly
  • 5.2 Select language to accommodate specific needs of the parties
  • 5.3 Engage interpreters according to agency guidelines to best promote understanding between all parties and mediators
  • 5.4 Organise equipment, tools and any other resources required to support mediation process when needed
The Range Statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts.


Knowledge refers to:
The understanding of relevant theories, principles, practices their application and other aspects of knowledge, which may be desirable or necessary in order to practice effectively an ADR process


Mediation process refers to knowledge about the procedural and understanding of requirements for dispute resolution within the agency, and may include:
The theory, systems and methods of dispute resolution processes and the place of the Agency within these
The management and conduct of a dispute resolution process
Stages of a dispute resolution process, and how they can be used most effectively
Assessment of individual cases to determine limitations of the ADR processes
Recognition of when a ADR process is not being effective
How to ensure fairness within procedure
Criteria for exercising discretion on procedural matters, for example, consultations with individual parties, and duration
How to identify who may be significant others and how to manage their appropriate involvement
How to enable parties to consider all relevant information and work towards their own decisions


Parties may include:
Individuals (including youth, adults and the aged)
Referred or self-referred clients
Voluntary and involuntary clients


Issues presented by parties may be further clarified through:
Interviews with parties, family, significant others and carers
Applications and other forms
Case documentation
Using specialist communicators
Information from professionals
Information from service providers
Previous file records
Client consent (verbal and written)


Cultural perspectives involve:
The significance of the diversity of the parties involved in ADR, including gender, religion, age, culture, language, race, education, socioeconomic status, and disability
Different cultural attitudes of members within a family
Cultural variations on the agreed norms and range of behaviours accepted as 'family practices'
The relevance of culture in relation to problem-solving and dispute resolution
The relevance of culture in relation to negotiation, concessions and compromise
Cultural variations in relation to written, spoken and non-verbal communication
Cultural attitudes towards physical space, venue and time
Cultural attitudes towards the role of outsiders in dispute resolution
Cultural attitudes in relation to the role of law, the courts, lawyers and professional advisers
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package.

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate this unit of competency:
The individual being assessed must provide evidence of specified essential knowledge as well as skills
Evidence of competency in this unit will need to be assessed over a period of time in order to gather evidence of consistent performance
This will include contexts applicable to the work environment, such as actual or simulated workplace situations involving a combination of direct, indirect and supplementary forms of evidence
Evidence will be determined by selection from the Range Statement, justified in terms of work requirements, work roles and responsibilities and occupational specialisations


Access and equity considerations:
All workers in community services should be aware of access, equity and human rights issues in relation to their own area of work
All workers should develop their ability to work in a culturally diverse environment
In recognition of particular issues facing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, workers should be aware of cultural, historical and current issues impacting on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
Assessors and trainers must take into account relevant access and equity issues, in particular relating to factors impacting on Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander clients and communities


Context of and specific resources for assessment:
This unit can be assessed independently, however holistic assessment practice with other community services units of competency is encouraged
Where assessment is conducted within the workplace there are no resource implications above those normally available in the workplace
Where assessment is conducted in a simulated or non-workplace environment then access to the necessary equipment and research resources should be providedAccess to simulated exercises, case studies related to mediation service delivery issues is also required if non-workplace assessment paths are utilised


Method of assessment:
Demonstration of competency within the working environment in preparing for the mediation process
Where there is not an opportunity to cover all relevant aspects in the work environment, the remainder should be assessed through realistic simulations, projects, previous relevant experience or oral questioning on 'what if?' Scenarios
Observation of processes and procedures, oral and/or written questions on Essential knowledge and skills and consideration of required attitudes
Where performance is not directly observed and/or is required to be demonstrated over a period of time and/or in a number of locations, any evidence should be authenticated by colleagues, supervisors, clients or other appropriate persons
Review of any documentation produced by the candidate related to the preparation for mediation
Replaces
State Code National Code Title Type
D2591 CHCMED411A Conduct a sound assessment of a dispute in preparation for mediation Unit of competency
Replaced By
State Code National Code Title Type
AWA75 CHCMED001 Prepare for mediation Unit of competency