Unit of competency Outline
Date retreived
22/07/2026 1:06 AM AWST
22/07/2026 1:06 AM AWST
Whilst all efforts are made to provide accurate and timely information from the relevant source/documentation, please be aware that the information supplied may not be the most current version. The accuracy of the detail has not been confirmed by the Department and therefore should not be relied upon without first confirming the contents.
Assess competence
Assess competence
Unit of competency
National Code
TAEASS402B
TAEASS402B
State Code
S7805
S7805
TGA Status
Replaced
Replaced
DTWD Status
Replaced
Replaced
State Implementation and Classification
Approved Date
04/11/2014
Field of Education
070109 - Teacher Education: Vocational Education And Training
Original Release Date
04/11/2014
Nominal Hours
15
Description
This unit describes the performance outcomes, skills and knowledge required to assess the competence of a candidate.
Notes
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Prepare for assessment
- 1.1 Interpret assessment plan and confirm organisational, legal and ethical requirements for conducting assessment with relevant people
- 1.2 Access and interpret relevant benchmarks for assessment and nominated assessment tools to confirm the requirements for evidence to be collected
- 1.3 Arrange identified material and physical resource requirements according to assessment system policies and procedures
- 1.4 Organise specialist support required for assessment
- 1.5 Explain, discuss and agree details of the assessment plan with candidate
2. Gather quality evidence
- 2.1 Use agreed assessment methods and instruments to gather, organise and document evidence in a format suitable for determining competence
- 2.2 Apply the principles of assessment and rules of evidence in gathering quality evidence
- 2.3 Determine opportunities for evidence gathering in actual or simulated activities through consultation with the candidate and relevant personnel
- 2.4 Determine opportunities for integrated assessment activities and document any changes to assessment instruments where required
3. Support the candidate
- 3.1 Guide candidates in gathering their own evidence to support recognition of prior learning (RPL)
- 3.2 Use appropriate communication and interpersonal skills to develop a professional relationship with the candidate that reflects sensitivity to individual differences and enables two-way feedback
- 3.3 Make decisions on reasonable adjustments with the candidate, based on candidate’s needs and characteristics
- 3.4 Access required specialist support in accordance with the assessment plan
- 3.5 Address any OHS risk to person or equipment immediately
4. Make the assessment decision
- 4.1 Examine collected evidence and evaluate it to ensure that it reflects the evidence required to demonstrate competence
- 4.2 Use judgement to infer whether competence has been demonstrated, based on the available evidence
- 4.3 Make assessment decision in line with agreed assessment procedures and according to agreed assessment plan
- 4.4 Provide clear and constructive feedback to candidate regarding the assessment decision and develop any follow-up action plan required
5. Record and report the assessment decision
- 5.1 Record assessment outcomes promptly and accurately
- 5.2 Complete and process an assessment report according to agreed assessment procedures
- 5.3 Inform other relevant parties of the assessment decision according to confidentiality conventions
6. Review the assessment process
- 6.1 Review the assessment process in consultation with relevant people to improve own future practice
- 6.2 Document and record the review according to relevant assessment system policies and procedures
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.
Assessment plan may include:
overall planning, describing:
what is to be assessed
when assessment is to take place
where assessment is to take place
how assessment is to take place.
Benchmarks for assessment:
refer to a criterion against which the candidate is assessed
may be a competency standard/unit of competency, assessment criteria of course curricula, performance specifications, or product specifications.
Assessment tools include:
the learning or competency unit(s) to be assessed
the target group, context and conditions for the assessment
the tasks to be administered to the candidate
an outline of the evidence to be gathered from the candidate
the evidence criteria used to judge the quality of performance (i.e. the assessment decision-making rules)
the administration, recording and reporting requirements
the evidence of how validity and reliability have been tested and built into the design and use of the tool.
Specialist support may include:
assistance by third party, such as carer or interpreter
support from specialist educator
provision of developed online assessment activities
support for remote or isolated candidates and assessors
support from subject matter or safety experts
advice from regulatory authorities
assessment teams and panels
support from lead assessors
advice from policy development experts.
Assessment methods include:
particular techniques used to gather different types of evidence, such as:
direct observation
structured activities
oral or written questioning
portfolios of evidence
review of products
third-party feedback.
Individual differences may include:
English language, literacy and numeracy barriers
physical impairment or disability
intellectual impairment or disability
medical condition that may impact on assessment, such as arthritis, epilepsy, diabetes and asthma
learning difficulties
mental or psychological disability
religious and spiritual observances
cultural images and perceptions
age
gender.
Feedback may include:
ensuring assessment/RPL process is understood
ensuring candidate concerns are addressed
enabling questions and answers
confirming outcomes
identifying further evidence to be provided
discussing action plans
confirming gap training needed
providing information regarding available appeal processes
suggesting improvements in evidence gathering and presentation.
Consultation may involve:
moderation with other assessors, or training and assessment coordinators
discussions with client, team leaders, managers, RPL coordinators, supervisors, coaches and mentors
technical and subject experts
English language, literacy and numeracy experts.
Assessment plan may include:
overall planning, describing:
what is to be assessed
when assessment is to take place
where assessment is to take place
how assessment is to take place.
Benchmarks for assessment:
refer to a criterion against which the candidate is assessed
may be a competency standard/unit of competency, assessment criteria of course curricula, performance specifications, or product specifications.
Assessment tools include:
the learning or competency unit(s) to be assessed
the target group, context and conditions for the assessment
the tasks to be administered to the candidate
an outline of the evidence to be gathered from the candidate
the evidence criteria used to judge the quality of performance (i.e. the assessment decision-making rules)
the administration, recording and reporting requirements
the evidence of how validity and reliability have been tested and built into the design and use of the tool.
Specialist support may include:
assistance by third party, such as carer or interpreter
support from specialist educator
provision of developed online assessment activities
support for remote or isolated candidates and assessors
support from subject matter or safety experts
advice from regulatory authorities
assessment teams and panels
support from lead assessors
advice from policy development experts.
Assessment methods include:
particular techniques used to gather different types of evidence, such as:
direct observation
structured activities
oral or written questioning
portfolios of evidence
review of products
third-party feedback.
Individual differences may include:
English language, literacy and numeracy barriers
physical impairment or disability
intellectual impairment or disability
medical condition that may impact on assessment, such as arthritis, epilepsy, diabetes and asthma
learning difficulties
mental or psychological disability
religious and spiritual observances
cultural images and perceptions
age
gender.
Feedback may include:
ensuring assessment/RPL process is understood
ensuring candidate concerns are addressed
enabling questions and answers
confirming outcomes
identifying further evidence to be provided
discussing action plans
confirming gap training needed
providing information regarding available appeal processes
suggesting improvements in evidence gathering and presentation.
Consultation may involve:
moderation with other assessors, or training and assessment coordinators
discussions with client, team leaders, managers, RPL coordinators, supervisors, coaches and mentors
technical and subject experts
English language, literacy and numeracy experts.
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package.
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
assess competence of a number of candidates within the vocational education and training context against different units of competency or accredited curricula, following the relevant assessment plan
assess at least one candidate for RPL
consider reasonable adjustment and the reasons for decisions in at least one assessment
cover an entire unit of competency and show:
the application of different assessment methods and instruments involving a range of assessment activities and events
two-way communication and feedback
how judgement was exercised in making the assessment decision
how and when assessment outcomes were recorded and reported
assessment records and reports completed in accordance with assessment system and organisational, legal and ethical requirements
how the assessment process was reviewed.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Evidence must be gathered in the workplace whenever possible. Where no workplace is available, a simulated workplace must be provided.
Method of assessment
Guidance information for assessment
Overview of assessment
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit
Evidence of the ability to:
assess competence of a number of candidates within the vocational education and training context against different units of competency or accredited curricula, following the relevant assessment plan
assess at least one candidate for RPL
consider reasonable adjustment and the reasons for decisions in at least one assessment
cover an entire unit of competency and show:
the application of different assessment methods and instruments involving a range of assessment activities and events
two-way communication and feedback
how judgement was exercised in making the assessment decision
how and when assessment outcomes were recorded and reported
assessment records and reports completed in accordance with assessment system and organisational, legal and ethical requirements
how the assessment process was reviewed.
Context of and specific resources for assessment
Evidence must be gathered in the workplace whenever possible. Where no workplace is available, a simulated workplace must be provided.
Method of assessment
Guidance information for assessment
Replaces
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| WA867 | TAEASS402A | Assess competence | Unit of competency |
Replaced By
| State Code | National Code | Title | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWY91 | TAEASS402 | Assess competence | Unit of competency |